Originally posted by Barbirollians
View Post
BaL 25.04.15 - Verdi: Macbeth
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View PostNowak or Haas?[FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
Comment
-
-
I think (or so I was told at school) that it's mostly the later witches scenes, & the procession of Banquo's descendants, that are the non-Shakespeare bits. The rest of it is sheer ambition at all costs, which perhaps Verdi didn't feel comfortable with - no tragic figures, or sympathetic ones.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Flosshilde View PostI'm afraid that it just doesn't do justice to the play (unlike Otello, I think).Our chief weapon is surprise...surprise and fear...fear and surprise.... Our two weapons are fear and surprise...and ruthless efficiency....
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Il Grande Inquisitor View PostI agree. Verdi's Macbeth isn't a patch on Shakespeare's. However, Otello is the equal to Othello and Falstaff surpasses The Merry Wives of Windsor!
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Il Grande Inquisitor View PostHowever, Otello is the equal to Othello and Falstaff surpasses The Merry Wives of Windsor![FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Lento View PostMemorable quote: "'Carry-on Up the Cauldron' spectacular". cf "manic Hungarian elephant dance" (Richard Morrison on Solti's Elgar 2 Scherzo, a few weeks ago). Also: "brave attempt" re one of the Verdi singers: AB examiners and local arts festival adjudicators take note.
I also enjoyed his offer of "The Order of the Golden Anorak" for anyone who identified the Schippers/Taddei/Nilsson
Originally posted by verismissimo View PostI have Schippers with Nilsson
This BaL did nothing to endear me to this composer's operas. In fact it was a quick listen on my return from holiday as I had to fast forward through most of the sopranos, I just can't bear it.
The only version to get my ears pricking up was the Leinsdorf in fact - pilloried by the reviewer for being dull, but his way with the opening right at the start of the programme seemed to me much more involving than the praised Muti comparison which struck me as more 'rumty-tum' and conventional.
Incidentally, if in one of the arias, we hear about "Macduffo" ( ), why is the bloody piece not called "Macbetho"?
Anyway, not one for me (Macduffo? Seriously???)
Next !!!!Last edited by Nick Armstrong; 29-04-15, 13:11."...the isle is full of noises,
Sounds and sweet airs, that give delight and hurt not.
Sometimes a thousand twangling instruments
Will hum about mine ears, and sometime voices..."
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Caliban View Post... why is the bloody piece not called "Macbetho"?
!
... a good question. In the dramatis personae he is referred to as Macbeth - but when his name occurs in the sung parts it is Macbetto, starting with the witches at the beginning - "Vien Macbetto. Eccolo qua!" "Salve o Macbetto, di Glamis sire!" ....
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View PostSherrill Milnes (Macbeth), Fiorenza Cossotto (Lady Macbeth), Jose Carreras (Macduff), Ruggero Raimondi (Banco), Giuliano Bernardi (Malcolm), Maria Borgato (Dama), Carlo Del Bosco (Medico), Ambrosian Opera Chorus, New Philharmonia Orchestra, Riccardo Muti (conductor)
Comment
-
Comment