Bal 21.03.15 - Haydn: Missa in Angustiis (Nelson Mass)

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Nick Armstrong
    Host
    • Nov 2010
    • 26628

    #61
    Originally posted by aka Calum Da Jazbo View Post
    .... of his final three i would plump for the sound quality of JEG over the other two but would not mind all three ... if he had spent so much time in blind listening he should have been given a three hour solo spot, i am certain he would have us all at rapt attention to every bar, mark, and tempi &c ....
    Yes... and I agree certain moments in the JEG sounded thrilling (there's a great moment in the Gloria when the sopranos leap up a perfect fourth, high and modulating as they go, on the '...ca...' of 'glorificamus' - the JEG version is hair-raisingly brilliant at that point, the sound penetrating, and the singers hitting the top note ideally... I might download that movement for that bit alone).

    But I take JS's point that - as so often - the sound of JEG's recordings often (imho) gets tiring through a whole work, and that the Rilling (which sounded a bit dowdy in short-extract comparison) might well win out on that front, sound-wise.

    (Didn't like Rilling's soprano much, though....)
    "...the isle is full of noises,
    Sounds and sweet airs, that give delight and hurt not.
    Sometimes a thousand twangling instruments
    Will hum about mine ears, and sometime voices..."

    Comment

    • BBMmk2
      Late Member
      • Nov 2010
      • 20908

      #62
      How did Hickox fair?
      Don’t cry for me
      I go where music was born

      J S Bach 1685-1750

      Comment

      • visualnickmos
        Full Member
        • Nov 2010
        • 3618

        #63
        Originally posted by Brassbandmaestro View Post
        How did Hickox fair?
        Not given the merest mention - surprisingly, as it's b*****y excellent!

        Comment

        • ardcarp
          Late member
          • Nov 2010
          • 11102

          #64
          I can't agree that the Nelson Mass "knocks spots off the other Haydn Masses"
          Each has his favourite, I guess! What makes The Nelson special for me is its glorious construction within a relatively concise framework. The Harmoniemesse, whilst of course displaying all Haydn's mastery, is just a bit long-winded [no pun intended]. Paukenmesse is a great one, I agree...Papa Haydn on top form...but apart from anything else, the Nelson's unusually elaborate soprano solo makes it at once 'different'... and special.

          Comment

          • BBMmk2
            Late Member
            • Nov 2010
            • 20908

            #65
            Originally posted by visualnickmos View Post
            Not given the merest mention - surprisingly, as it's b*****y excellent!
            Thanks Vis! I think so too. The whole box set of them is! :)
            Don’t cry for me
            I go where music was born

            J S Bach 1685-1750

            Comment

            • underthecountertenor
              Full Member
              • Apr 2011
              • 1587

              #66
              Returning briefly to the format of this BaL: I did find AMcG's interventions more than usually irritating and unhelpful. The most egregious was after a wonderful excerpt from the Pinnock recording, featuring Carolyn Watkinson singing gloriously in the Agnus Dei, when McG decided it was in some way relevant or helpful to tell us that he had difficulties with singers pronouncing 'agnus' with a hard G. JS's response was remarkably diplomatic in the circumstances. I'd have been tempted to throw the autograph score at him.

              Comment

              Working...
              X