Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie
View Post
BaL 6.12.14 - Bach: 4 Orchestral Suites (BWV 1066-69)
Collapse
X
-
tigajen
-
Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View PostThat kind of put-down isn't helpful. It's quite possible to put forward counter-arguments to insult the kind of performances that you may prefer.
Right Instruments
Right pitch
18th Century "feeling"
"Hierarchical stresses" and "non-stresses" a-plenty?
Insult away![FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
Comment
-
-
tigajen
Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View Post???
Right Instruments
Right pitch
18th Century "feeling"
"Hierarchical stresses" and "non-stresses" a-plenty?
Insult away!
Comment
-
No, tigajen - the apology should be mine: Alpie and I have a fondness for taking potshots at each other in matters Baroque - no offence is ever intended or (I hope!) taken, and no hornets have ever been harmed in the making of such posts. Please do not be put off posting by my childishness[FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
Comment
-
-
tigajen
Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View PostNo, tigajen - the apology should be mine: Alpie and I have a fondness for taking potshots at each other in matters Baroque - no offence is ever intended or (I hope!) taken, and no hornets have ever been harmed in the making of such posts. Please do not be put off posting by my childishness
Comment
-
Originally posted by verismissimo View Postthe recently emerged school of conductors using traditional instruments (can that be the right descriptor?) , but deploying learnings and approaches from the HIPP movement - Ticciati, Zinman, Nezet, Mackerras etc.
Of course, disregarded by current HIPP exponents, Leppard was doing just that in the 1960s!
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Brassbandmaestro View PostDon't get me wrong, I like HIPP performers, and what they do, I still think that there is room for non-HIPP, eg ASMF/Mariner and ECO/Leppard, etc.[FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Tony View PostOh dear, oh dear, apologies to all and sundry.
it was MY childishness that caused this little 'spat'.
Comment
-
-
Pity the Café Z versions were somewhat damned with faint praise. The 'winner' sounded to be sporting the sort of 'steely' sound in the strings that I both dislike and find ironic given it sounds more as if they're playing on wire than the 'old-fashioned metal string' brigade...! The mentions of a distracting sound above also put me off.
Must hear again what was said about Koopman's set which I find is the only CD I have; to add to my Café Z downloads, I suspect I may give into the temptation of acquiring Suzuki's set - I love their sound.
And I am also tempted by that first Argo Marriner! It sounded very winning, from the extracts, to me!
I got to know these pieces as the first Suite was one of my 'O'-level music set works (I suspect the same may be true of others here).... but I listened to them on the ...
Munchinger set that the parents had (an earlier one, not the later one illustrated on BAL). Not really tolerable in any way these days...
But a good BAL - it took me about 90 minutes to listen to as I kept going back to hear each extract and ML's comments a second time. Fascinating."...the isle is full of noises,
Sounds and sweet airs, that give delight and hurt not.
Sometimes a thousand twangling instruments
Will hum about mine ears, and sometime voices..."
Comment
-
-
Roehre
Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View PostDon't beat yourself up about it, Tony. The reviewer was much more patronising. Somethimg along the lines of "When I heard the Karl Richter, I larfed."
There have been some developments the last five decades
Comment
Comment