An interesting thread this one - I have always been fascinated by who does what, and indeed who doesn't, didn't and hasn't. A few thoughts:
1 Abbado - no Elgar - when he was at the LSO would have been a great opportunity.
2 Bernstein would have perhaps produced some interesting Delius.
3 Boulez and RVW not that far-fetched, after all he did study under Ravel - Boulez Ravel to my ears is near the top of the pile.
4 Karajan - I would not accuse him of recording things for sake of completeness - quite the opposite - Nielsen, only no 4 (recorded twice), Shostakovich only no10 (recorded twice), Prokofiev only no1 & 5, Stravinsky Rite (recorded twice but no Petrouchka or Firebird) and more surprisingly perhaps, no Mahler 1 2 3 or 8! Someone mentioned him in Rachmaninov - he would have probably delivered a superb Sym 2!
5 Elgar and Bruckner - yes they are very different but surely the 3rd movement of Elgar 1 is not sonically a million miles away from Bruckner.
6 Barenboim's Elgar Symphonies had mixed reviews at the time - early 70s - it would be interesting to hear whether the years has changed his interpretations - has he done them lately?
7 At risk of upsetting all the boarders who are in awe of Haitink - over his long career he has covered a relatively wide range of composers but now this 'flying conductor' in demand by many orchestras in an era of live recordings repetition is reaching overload - and not all good - his 1979 LPO live RFH recording to me sounds dull. Is he a safe pair of hands or exciting?
1 Abbado - no Elgar - when he was at the LSO would have been a great opportunity.
2 Bernstein would have perhaps produced some interesting Delius.
3 Boulez and RVW not that far-fetched, after all he did study under Ravel - Boulez Ravel to my ears is near the top of the pile.
4 Karajan - I would not accuse him of recording things for sake of completeness - quite the opposite - Nielsen, only no 4 (recorded twice), Shostakovich only no10 (recorded twice), Prokofiev only no1 & 5, Stravinsky Rite (recorded twice but no Petrouchka or Firebird) and more surprisingly perhaps, no Mahler 1 2 3 or 8! Someone mentioned him in Rachmaninov - he would have probably delivered a superb Sym 2!
5 Elgar and Bruckner - yes they are very different but surely the 3rd movement of Elgar 1 is not sonically a million miles away from Bruckner.
6 Barenboim's Elgar Symphonies had mixed reviews at the time - early 70s - it would be interesting to hear whether the years has changed his interpretations - has he done them lately?
7 At risk of upsetting all the boarders who are in awe of Haitink - over his long career he has covered a relatively wide range of composers but now this 'flying conductor' in demand by many orchestras in an era of live recordings repetition is reaching overload - and not all good - his 1979 LPO live RFH recording to me sounds dull. Is he a safe pair of hands or exciting?
Comment