Conductors' allergic reactions?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Karafan
    Full Member
    • Nov 2010
    • 786

    Conductors' allergic reactions?

    Skyping my friend Akiralx this morning, he commented on how certain conductors, somewhat strangely, never seem to venture into certain fields, even though you suspect that in some instances they may well be temperamentally suited to that particular repertoire and may well even have been wonderful interpreters of those composers.

    Our discussion touched on Sibelius and how neither Abbado nor Haitink (or even Solti and some others) never ventured to conduct his pieces, or certainly record them.

    Any views? Which conductors have you ever thought would be suited to certain composers, whom they seem never to have touched with a stick (or even baton)?

    K.
    "Let me have my own way in exactly everything, and a sunnier and more pleasant creature does not exist." Thomas Carlyle
  • ferneyhoughgeliebte
    Gone fishin'
    • Sep 2011
    • 30163

    #2
    Originally posted by Karafan View Post
    Which conductors have you ever thought would be suited to certain composers, whom they seem never to have touched with a stick (or even baton)?
    I would have loved to hear Karajan conduct Elgar - especially the 'cello Concerto with Rostropovich (and/or the Violin Concerto with Mutter). Towards the end of his life (at the time when he was also preparing the Nielsen 4th), he did send for scores to study: most he sent back fairly quickly, but he kept the Second Symphony, suggesting that it was the work with which he felt he might have something valid to say.
    [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

    Comment

    • Petrushka
      Full Member
      • Nov 2010
      • 12252

      #3
      I've heard Abbado conduct Sibelius! OK it was the Violin Concerto (with Isaac Stern, 30/09/1982, RFH) which preceded Mahler 5 and i believe that Haitink is scheduled to conduct the same piece this season but can't now find the info on the web. Haitink is on record as saying that he feels nothing for Sibelius or Nielsen. A pity.

      Agree here with FHG that Karajan would have made a superb Elgar conductor. HvK's affinity with Bruckner provides the link. Such a pity that he never did.

      Solti did conduct Walton but how I wish he'd done the First Symphony. Absolutely tailor made for him, I would have thought.

      Also wish Abbado would tackle Shostakovich. Is it already too late?
      "The sound is the handwriting of the conductor" - Bernard Haitink

      Comment

      • Roehre

        #4
        Haitink has conducted Sibelius once: Tapiola in 1957, with his then orchestra, The Netherlands Radio Philharmonic Orchestra in Hilversum, a work programmed In memoriam Sibelius. That's it, and no Nielsen at all, AFAIK
        Last edited by Guest; 30-06-13, 16:18.

        Comment

        • Eine Alpensinfonie
          Host
          • Nov 2010
          • 20570

          #5
          Boulez conducting Tchaikovsky.

          Comment

          • Richard Tarleton

            #6
            Originally posted by Petrushka View Post
            Agree here with FHG that Karajan would have made a superb Elgar conductor. HvK's affinity with Bruckner provides the link.
            Please explain that one to me Petrushka! Elgar and Bruckner? What am I missing?

            Comment

            • ferneyhoughgeliebte
              Gone fishin'
              • Sep 2011
              • 30163

              #7
              Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View Post
              Boulez conducting Tchaikovsky.
              ?

              You think Boulez is "suited" to Tchaikovsky, Alpie?
              [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

              Comment

              • Petrushka
                Full Member
                • Nov 2010
                • 12252

                #8
                Originally posted by Richard Tarleton View Post
                Please explain that one to me Petrushka! Elgar and Bruckner? What am I missing?
                Surprising on the face of it but there are parts of Bruckner that have a distinct Elgarian touch (better to think of it that way round). The slow movement of the 5th Symphony has a noticeable 'Nimrod' feel to it. You can sense similar touches in the 7th as well. One wonders how much Bruckner that Elgar may have heard and absorbed especially during his time in Leipzig. In general, it places Elgar firmly in the great European tradition.
                "The sound is the handwriting of the conductor" - Bernard Haitink

                Comment

                • pastoralguy
                  Full Member
                  • Nov 2010
                  • 7759

                  #9
                  I would love to have heard Karajan 'do' the VW 'Tallis' fantasia with those wonderful Berlin Phil. strings! I know his recording with the Philharmonia is a classic but a remake could have been really good.

                  How about John Eliot Gardiner doing Sibelius? He would really make sense of all those multi divided string parts!

                  Comment

                  • Petrushka
                    Full Member
                    • Nov 2010
                    • 12252

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Roehre View Post
                    Haitink has conducted Sibelius once: Tapiola in 1957, with his then orchestra, The Netherlands Radio Philharmonic Orchestra in Hilversum, a work programmed In memoriam Sibelius. That's it, and no Nielsen at all, AFAIK


                    This might be of interest. It appears that Haitink presided over an account of the Sibelius VC with the Boston SO and Joshua Bell.

                    And also with the VPO and Vilde Frang: http://www.worldconcerthall.com/en/s..._strauss/6382/
                    "The sound is the handwriting of the conductor" - Bernard Haitink

                    Comment

                    • EdgeleyRob
                      Guest
                      • Nov 2010
                      • 12180

                      #11
                      Originally posted by Petrushka View Post
                      Haitink is on record as saying that he feels nothing for Sibelius or Nielsen.

                      Ah

                      Haitink I'm on the same wavelength.

                      Comment

                      • Parry1912
                        Full Member
                        • Nov 2010
                        • 963

                        #12
                        I remember seeing somewhere on this forum a mock-up of an album cover for Boulez conducting RVW's 'Pastoral'. I would love to hear that for real. I think that Boulez' affinity for Ravel and Bartok might make him a really good RVW conductor.
                        Del boy: “Get in, get out, don’t look back. That’s my motto!”

                        Comment

                        • ferneyhoughgeliebte
                          Gone fishin'
                          • Sep 2011
                          • 30163

                          #13
                          Originally posted by Parry1912 View Post
                          I remember seeing somewhere on this forum a mock-up of an album cover for Boulez conducting RVW's 'Pastoral'. I would love to hear that for real. I think that Boulez' affinity for Ravel and Bartok might make him a really good RVW conductor.
                          There was certainly a fake Boulez RVW 4 & 6 (with the Cleveland Orchestra) advertised as an April Fool in a magazine that I was taken in by! (The resulting visit to my local CD shop is partly why I now do the majority of my shopping online!)

                          Boulez is on record as saying that he thinks RVW a far more interesting composer than his French contemporaries of the '20s & '30s - that's why I found the April Fool so plausible!
                          [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

                          Comment

                          • Richard Tarleton

                            #14
                            Originally posted by Petrushka View Post
                            Surprising on the face of it but there are parts of Bruckner that have a distinct Elgarian touch (better to think of it that way round). The slow movement of the 5th Symphony has a noticeable 'Nimrod' feel to it. You can sense similar touches in the 7th as well. One wonders how much Bruckner that Elgar may have heard and absorbed especially during his time in Leipzig. In general, it places Elgar firmly in the great European tradition.
                            Thanks for that. Without wishing to derail the thread, I've always thought there was a strong affinity between Elgar's and Brahms' symphonies, but not Bruckner's....the long flowing melodic line of Nimrod, hmmmm, will have to listen again to the 5th!

                            Comment

                            • ferneyhoughgeliebte
                              Gone fishin'
                              • Sep 2011
                              • 30163

                              #15
                              Originally posted by Richard Tarleton View Post
                              Thanks for that. Without wishing to derail the thread, I've always thought there was a strong affinity between Elgar's and Brahms' symphonies, but not Bruckner's....the long flowing melodic line of Nimrod, hmmmm, will have to listen again to the 5th!
                              Webern once played the slow Movement of Bruckner's 7th to his English pupil, Humphrey Searle and asked him "What is there in your Elgar to match that!"

                              I so wish Searle had played Webern the slow Movement of Elgar's 2nd - that "Brucknerian" long line is there, too.
                              [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X