DG Vienna Philharmonic 50 CD Symphony Edition

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Eine Alpensinfonie
    Host
    • Nov 2010
    • 20570

    DG Vienna Philharmonic 50 CD Symphony Edition

    I couldn't resist this, even though it involved quite a bit of duplication.

    The Levine set of the Mozart symphonies was better than I had anticipated, and was my main reason for buying the set.
    The Beethoven cycle is a mixed set from Bernstein, Abbado, Bohm, and Kleiber, mostly very good.
    Similarly the Brahms works are a blend of Bernstein, Giulini and Kleiber - all of 'em good.
    Bernstein did all the Schumann works, though no. 1 suffers from some wiry recording.
    Bruckner doesn't have a full cycle, with 2, 3 & 6 omitted, but with some of the best of Abbado, Karajan & Giulini.
    A smattering of Schubert, Mendelssohn, Haydn, Dvorak, Tchaikovsky, oSibelius and Shostakovitch symphonies seems rather random in view of the fact that there other DG VPO recordings that coulda have been incorporated.
    2 & 7 are omitted from the Mahler cycle with Bernstein, Abbado and Boulez.

    Perhaps an opportunity was missed by DG not collaborating with Decca, whose VPO symphony collection is considerable. The Decca versions are generally better recorded, and the missing bits of the Mendelssohn, Schubert, Sibelius, Tchaikovsky and Bruckner cycles could have been found from here, not to mention a Shostakovitch 5 and some more Haydn. From DG's own recordings, there could have been a Mahler 10 and a Dvorak 3.
  • pastoralguy
    Full Member
    • Nov 2010
    • 7758

    #2
    I bought it too, Alpine, but it's still in its plastic wrapping awaiting the day I'll have time to listen to it.

    Comment

    • silvestrione
      Full Member
      • Jan 2011
      • 1707

      #3
      Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View Post
      I couldn't resist this, even though it involved quite a bit of duplication.

      The Levine set of the Mozart symphonies was better than I had anticipated, and was my main reason for buying the set.
      The Beethoven cycle is a mixed set from Bernstein, Abbado, Bohm, and Kleiber, mostly very good.
      Similarly the Brahms works are a blend of Bernstein, Giulini and Kleiber - all of 'em good.
      Bernstein did all the Schumann works, though no. 1 suffers from some wiry recording.
      Bruckner doesn't have a full cycle, with 2, 3 & 6 omitted, but with some of the best of Abbado, Karajan & Giulini.
      A smattering of Schubert, Mendelssohn, Haydn, Dvorak, Tchaikovsky, oSibelius and Shostakovitch symphonies seems rather random in view of the fact that there other DG VPO recordings that coulda have been incorporated.
      2 & 7 are omitted from the Mahler cycle with Bernstein, Abbado and Boulez.

      Perhaps an opportunity was missed by DG not collaborating with Decca, whose VPO symphony collection is considerable. The Decca versions are generally better recorded, and the missing bits of the Mendelssohn, Schubert, Sibelius, Tchaikovsky and Bruckner cycles could have been found from here, not to mention a Shostakovitch 5 and some more Haydn. From DG's own recordings, there could have been a Mahler 10 and a Dvorak 3.
      That's helpful Alpens. There's also a detailed breakdown and review (mainly positive) in the current IRR.

      Comment

      • Petrushka
        Full Member
        • Nov 2010
        • 12247

        #4
        I did wonder who this enormous set was aimed at when I saw it announced because VPO fans (I'm one of them!) will have collected most of these as they came out. However, glad to see that there are one or two satisfied customers.

        It looks a wonderful set to have on the shelves but, alas, far too much duplication for me.
        "The sound is the handwriting of the conductor" - Bernard Haitink

        Comment

        • BBMmk2
          Late Member
          • Nov 2010
          • 20908

          #5
          Yes, completely agree with you there, petrushka. I just cannot see the point of this kind of promotion.
          Don’t cry for me
          I go where music was born

          J S Bach 1685-1750

          Comment

          • Eine Alpensinfonie
            Host
            • Nov 2010
            • 20570

            #6
            Presumably because people (like me) buy them. My duplication was less than one might expect. For eaxmple, I had none of the Carlos Kleiber symphony recordings, despite their almost legendary status.
            The reason for not having bought these and others has been my ambivalence towards DG. In my youth, I was told that they represented the ultimate in quality, and their impressive covers certainly suggested this. Things changed when I bought the Bohm Beethoven symphony cycle in 1972. Having previously bought the Decca Schmitt-Isserstedt box, I expected a better better quality of recorded sound. But teh DG ones lacked depth in comparison. So my DG purchases became rarer.
            Listening to this 50 CD set does suggest that I might have over-reacted, but that boxy, congested sound does rear its ugly head occasionally, such as in the Abbado Bruckner 1.

            Comment

            • Thropplenoggin
              Full Member
              • Mar 2013
              • 1587

              #7
              Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View Post
              Presumably because people (like me) buy them. My duplication was less than one might expect. For eaxmple, I had none of the Carlos Kleiber symphony recordings, despite their almost legendary status.
              The reason for not having bought these and others has been my ambivalence towards DG. In my youth, I was told that they represented the ultimate in quality, and their impressive covers certainly suggested this. Things changed when I bought the Bohm Beethoven symphony cycle in 1972. Having previously bought the Decca Schmitt-Isserstedt box, I expected a better better quality of recorded sound. But teh DG ones lacked depth in comparison. So my DG purchases became rarer.
              Listening to this 50 CD set does suggest that I might have over-reacted, but that boxy, congested sound does rear its ugly head occasionally, such as in the Abbado Bruckner 1.
              Gosh! To have lived thus far without his Beethoven 5 and 7? An unenviable feat, EA.

              His Brahms 4 and Schubert 8 'unfinished' are exceptional readings, too. Surely you had his Tristan und Isolde, though?!
              It loved to happen. -- Marcus Aurelius

              Comment

              • Petrushka
                Full Member
                • Nov 2010
                • 12247

                #8
                I bought the Karajan 1960s box last year as I had only a few duplications. DG sound quality at that time was very, very good indeed but then went markedly downhill from the time they started recording in the Philharmonie in about 1973. The Vienna Musikverein, though an acoustic marvel, is a difficult recording venue and DG did their VPO recordings there while Decca used the superb Sofiensaal. Wish that Schmidt-Issertedt LvB cycle would be reissued.

                To be honest, I'd agree with EA's assessment of the sound quality accorded to Kleiber's celebrated Beethoven and Brahms. I have them, naturally, but hardly play them these days. Exceptional readings, to be sure, but let down by the sound quality which is inferior to that given to Karajan in the 1960s.
                "The sound is the handwriting of the conductor" - Bernard Haitink

                Comment

                • amateur51

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Thropplenoggin View Post
                  Gosh! To have lived thus far without his Beethoven 5 and 7? An unenviable feat, EA.

                  His Brahms 4 and Schubert 8 'unfinished' are exceptional readings, too. Surely you had his Tristan und Isolde, though?!
                  On another thread recently you spoke of spending a day getting to know Tristan Throppers. Which version did you choose and how did it go?

                  Comment

                  • Thropplenoggin
                    Full Member
                    • Mar 2013
                    • 1587

                    #10
                    Originally posted by amateur51 View Post
                    On another thread recently you spoke of spending a day getting to know Tristan Throppers. Which version did you choose and how did it go?
                    Kleiber/Price/Pape. I've heard it and, well, I felt transfigured by the end of it, in a way no music has ever made me feel. It was almost as if I was held under a spell, something daemonic or witchcrafty about its relentless transfixing power...a mesmerising, quite unforgettable experience.

                    I'll report back anon, Ams, as I have questions to ask of more experienced ears. Alas, no time to go in depth at present. Boxes still to be packed!
                    It loved to happen. -- Marcus Aurelius

                    Comment

                    • amateur51

                      #11
                      Originally posted by Thropplenoggin View Post
                      Kleiber/Price/Pape. I've heard it and, well, I felt transfigured by the end of it, in a way no music has ever made me feel. It was almost as if I was held under a spell, something daemonic or witchcrafty about its relentless transfixing power...a mesmerising, quite unforgettable experience.

                      I'll report back anon, Ams, as I have questions to ask of more experienced ears. Alas, no time to go in depth at present. Boxes still to be packed!
                      Triffic!

                      Comment

                      • Eine Alpensinfonie
                        Host
                        • Nov 2010
                        • 20570

                        #12
                        Originally posted by Thropplenoggin View Post
                        Surely you had his Tristan und Isolde, though?!
                        Nope! Furtwangler (twice!), Solti & Pappano, but no Kleiber.

                        Comment

                        • Thropplenoggin
                          Full Member
                          • Mar 2013
                          • 1587

                          #13
                          Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View Post
                          Nope! Furtwangler (twice!), Solti & Pappano, but no Kleiber.
                          You should. Price is exquisite. Likewise Kurt Moll. And Kleiber teases out every subtle nuance in the orchestral score (I base this on the reports of others, inc. BaL; as it's my first Tristan, I have nothing to compare it to. Though Kleiber always gives a fresh and unexpected interpretation, in my experience.)
                          It loved to happen. -- Marcus Aurelius

                          Comment

                          • amateur51

                            #14
                            Originally posted by Thropplenoggin View Post
                            You should. Price is exquisite. Likewise Kurt Moll. And Kleiber teases out every subtle nuance in the orchestral score (I base this on the reports of others, inc. BaL; as it's my first Tristan, I have nothing to compare it to. Though Kleiber always gives a fresh and unexpected interpretation, in my experience.)
                            Carlos Kleiber filmed conducting Tristan ?at Bayreuth, ghostly images perhaps but fascinating nonetheless

                            Comment

                            • Eine Alpensinfonie
                              Host
                              • Nov 2010
                              • 20570

                              #15
                              Vienna Philharmonic recordings have virtually dried up.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X