M13 Bert Coules
Yes, David Ward as Jesus, Peter Pears as Evangelist, Lindsay Heather as Pilate, Brian Etheridge as Peter, Robert Tear as A Servant. Also featuring Elizabeth Harwood, Helen Watts, Alexander Young, Hervey Alan. Not to mention some pretty impressive instrumental soloists: Kenneth Heath (cello), Francis Baines (double bass), Thurston Dart (harpsichord), Simon Preston (organ). Philomusica of London (was this an orchestra put together specially for recording, I've not otherwise heard of them?) and choir of King's College Cambridge directed by David Willcocks, recorded in the chapel. Argo ZRG 5322, dated 1960 and, according to the sleeve, a highlights disc from the complete work on Argo ZRG 5270-2, which I've never seen.
And another post (Mary?), no, I dont actually find it dull - Bach can be academic at times, but not here, and he's never dull - its just that the passions dont connect. For me, I think it is something to do with the religion: I'm not religious and although I can usually engage with Bach because of the musical qualities, the overt weeping and grovelling of the passions really repels me, wonderful music not withstanding.
If you can sing well enough to be in a choir, then you are very fortunate, it must bring a whole new dimension to music. Unfortunately, I cant and that's not just my opinion, it was confirmed by a professional. When I was admitted to my public school in the early 1960s, all new boys had to audition for the choir. We all lined up in the music master's study and stepped up one by one to the piano. My audition went like this: "Next." Plays a note. "Sing that." I try. "Thank you. Next." And that was that.
Yes, David Ward as Jesus, Peter Pears as Evangelist, Lindsay Heather as Pilate, Brian Etheridge as Peter, Robert Tear as A Servant. Also featuring Elizabeth Harwood, Helen Watts, Alexander Young, Hervey Alan. Not to mention some pretty impressive instrumental soloists: Kenneth Heath (cello), Francis Baines (double bass), Thurston Dart (harpsichord), Simon Preston (organ). Philomusica of London (was this an orchestra put together specially for recording, I've not otherwise heard of them?) and choir of King's College Cambridge directed by David Willcocks, recorded in the chapel. Argo ZRG 5322, dated 1960 and, according to the sleeve, a highlights disc from the complete work on Argo ZRG 5270-2, which I've never seen.
And another post (Mary?), no, I dont actually find it dull - Bach can be academic at times, but not here, and he's never dull - its just that the passions dont connect. For me, I think it is something to do with the religion: I'm not religious and although I can usually engage with Bach because of the musical qualities, the overt weeping and grovelling of the passions really repels me, wonderful music not withstanding.
If you can sing well enough to be in a choir, then you are very fortunate, it must bring a whole new dimension to music. Unfortunately, I cant and that's not just my opinion, it was confirmed by a professional. When I was admitted to my public school in the early 1960s, all new boys had to audition for the choir. We all lined up in the music master's study and stepped up one by one to the piano. My audition went like this: "Next." Plays a note. "Sing that." I try. "Thank you. Next." And that was that.
Comment