Originally posted by Barbirollians
View Post
Vaughan Williams: The symphonies
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by HighlandDougie View PostOK, I know I'm thick but who he (or she)? I can only think Stokowski (fine performance indeed) as Boult didn't have many locks to engolden."The sound is the handwriting of the conductor" - Bernard Haitink
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Petrushka View PostFor some reason that completely escapes me Goldilocks is the name Col Danby persists in giving to Andrew Davis.
An explanation would be appreciated.
Comment
-
-
What a wonderful thread this continues to be BBM - somewhere way back someone asked for views of the, now wonderfully cheap, Boult EMI set which Santa brought me. Previously, shamefully, I only had a few downloaded versions of RVW symphonies which I hadn't given enough time to. Now I have the luxury of a little break from work, kids and grandkids I am thoroughly enjoying every wonderful minute. For, to be truthful, a beginner I cannot recommend the set highly enough. The disc with 2 and 3 I find myself, ER-like, playing everyday. What, as has been repeatedly said, a body of work.
Comment
-
-
I was given the very same AG!!I havnt had time to hear it yet though? I still want to purchase the Haitink and previn sets.
I still cannot understand why, I seem to be one of ea few peoplehere,who delishgts at the thought of Sir Andrew Davis and RVWs music. Ithought his Prom performance and subsequent reocrding of Job wasverygood and I have others in my collection to.Last edited by BBMmk2; 12-01-13, 20:54.Don’t cry for me
I go where music was born
J S Bach 1685-1750
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Barbirollians View PostI am firmly of the view that Andrew Davis is the most overrated conductor since Neville Marriner . Both have made more boring recordings in my experience than any other conductor .
I am inclined to agree with you where recordings are concerned, and his set of the Vaughan Williams symphonies is a case in point. There is a sort of grey dullness about them. Perhaps he's one of those conductors who fail to strike sparks at recording sessions. I have heard him give excellent performances in concerts, again with RVW, his Proms performance of No. 9 is far better than his studio version.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Petrushka View PostFor some reason that completely escapes me Goldilocks is the name Col Danby persists in giving to Andrew Davis. An explanation would be appreciated. More appreciated still would be to call him by his proper name.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by antongould View PostWhat a wonderful thread this continues to be BBM - somewhere way back someone asked for views of the, now wonderfully cheap, Boult EMI set which Santa brought me. Previously, shamefully, I only had a few downloaded versions of RVW symphonies which I hadn't given enough time to. Now I have the luxury of a little break from work, kids and grandkids I am thoroughly enjoying every wonderful minute. For, to be truthful, a beginner I cannot recommend the set highly enough. The disc with 2 and 3 I find myself, ER-like, playing everyday. What, as has been repeatedly said, a body of work.
(got any good racing tips?..time spent pays off on that as well !)I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.
I am not a number, I am a free man.
Comment
-
Comment