Originally posted by Bryn
View Post
Road-testing Period Beethoven Symphony Cycles - Sundry Thoughts
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by MickyD View PostThe Collegium Aureum also did the first period Missa Solemnis back in the 1970s, which I remember got well and truly hammered by the critic in Gramophone at the time. It would be interesting to hear it now.
[Found it. I had forgotten that it was a quadraphonic recording (SQ on LP). I doubt a surround version will ever appear on SACD or Blu-ray though. Currently being transferred to hard disc at 44.1/16 for a rough burn to CD-R.]
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Thropplenoggin View PostI skipped the pioneering period instrument brigade (Hogwood, Gardiner and Norrington) out of personal prejudice against their "clattery" or "too lean" approach. Surely 'period performance' has evolved since then, right? And I never warmed to Harnocourt's HIP-ish compromise (but perhaps that was more Harnoncourt than his compromise!*)
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Bryn View PostI've given up on the transfer of the Missa Solemnis. I must have foolishly lent the discs to a 'freind'. The distortion is horrendous.
I have always liked the Hogwood performances - his disc of the seventh and eighth were recorded with an enormous period band and pack a real punch, especially in the eighth. Not to everyone's taste, I know! I have always been meaning to get hold of the later Gardiner set, because I would guess his ORR benefited from more years of playing and a slicker performance, but haven't got round to it yet. What can others tell me about it?
Comment
-
-
If you like Gardiner's approach, I can imagine you'll find his Beethoven Symphonies exciting and invigorating. Personally, I find them monochrome, lacking in nuance and glaringly aggressive. His Missa Solemnis, by contrast, I find as good as any in the catalogue that I know (still haven't got round to Steinberg's: it's a big work that needs an afternoon set aside for it). Of the three Brits (Norrington, Hogwood, JEG) I prefer Norrington. But would go for Bruggen to any of them - and to Krivine well above them all. (van Immerseel is mentioned in my letter to Santa!)[FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
Comment
-
-
Thropplenoggin
Bryn and fhg: what is it you like about the Krivine? Did you not find, say, the opening of the 5th suffers from that 'compartmentalisation' I spoke of vis-a-vis the orchestra? Perhaps I shouldn't listen on headphones!
Comment
-
Thropplenoggin
Originally posted by MickyD View PostI see in this month's IRR that a new Glossa set has been released of all the symphonies recorded in Rotterdam in 2011 by Bruggen. Has anyone heard it yet?
EDIT:
Here are two reviews:
Comment
-
Originally posted by MickyD View PostI see in this month's IRR that a new Glossa set has been released of all the symphonies recorded in Rotterdam in 2011 by Bruggen. Has anyone heard it yet?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Thropplenoggin View PostBryn and fhg: what is it you like about the Krivine?
Glorious stuff that Krevine!! I have just listened to Number 7 (my favourite Beethoven Symphony). Although the period timbre is entirely different the overall jollity and brisk tempi take me back to my first records of Beethoven 7 that I bought in the mid-sixties with the LSO under Pierre Monteux and the Philharmonia under Carlo Maria Giulini (who was brisk until old age: much faster in the trio of the scherzo than Krevine. Giulini played it as a jig). I have put the site on a shortcut as it sounds like a companion for my current favourites (both of the Charles Mackerras sets). Many thanks.
The Krivine set as a whole is magnificent, Chris (and not that expensive, I'm sorry to say! ) - the performances lack nothing in incendiary power, but simultaneously manage to convey a dance-like joy in the Music that I've never heard before. Unlike the You Tube video, all repeats are included and audience noise is barely perceptible: in fact the applause at the ends of the works often comes as a shock. Superb playing (must be all the women: more in the 'cello section than in the entire VPO ) and the instrumental "flavours" as well-balanced and exhilerating as a fine single malt.
I was given this set for Christmas, (following several hints!) and it's repeatedly been played since. The CD Review that was so critical about Thielemann was also quite sniffy about these performances (Stephen Johnson occasionally condescending to comment favourably on the odd moment or two): they really missed a "Library Essential" BIG TIME!
Did you not find, say, the opening of the 5th suffers from that 'compartmentalisation' I spoke of vis-a-vis the orchestra? Perhaps I shouldn't listen on headphones!
Best Wishes.[FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
Comment
-
Comment