Originally posted by Bryn
View Post
Neglected masterworks
Collapse
X
-
Panjandrum
-
Panjandrum
Originally posted by rauschwerk View PostI really cannot see how an unfinished piece can be regarded as a masterpiece!
Bruckner 9?
Mahler 10?
Lulu?
Turandot?
Poppea?
Mozart's Requiem (comp.Sussmayr)?
Elgar 3?
Care to rethink that POV Rausch?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Panjandrum View PostSchubert 8?
Bruckner 9?
Mahler 10?
Lulu?
Turandot?
Poppea?
Mozart's Requiem (comp.Sussmayr)?
Elgar 3?
Care to rethink that POV Rausch?
We can happily listen to Schubert 8 and Bruckner 9 as their composers left them. Other works left truncated (Lulu, Turandot) can be regarded as masterworks because we know exactly what the composer completed. In the case of the Mozart, we know what he wrote from the surviving autograph scores, treat those bits as masterly and put up with the rest. Works completed entirely or largely from sketches (Mahler 10, Elgar 3, Ives Universe symphony) are much more problematic. If they be masterpieces, is that due to the composer or the completer?
Comment
-
-
Panjandrum
Originally posted by rauschwerk View PostWorks completed entirely or largely from sketches (Mahler 10, Elgar 3, Ives Universe symphony) are much more problematic. If they be masterpieces, is that due to the composer or the completer?
FWIW, my own view is that if the finished result satisfies the criteria of "masterpiece" or near-masterpiece (whatever that is), why worry about whose inspiration is behind it.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Panjandrum View PostFWIW, my own view is that if the finished result satisfies the criteria of "masterpiece" ... why worry about whose inspiration is behind it.[FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Pabmusic View PostIn fact, there's quite a bit of Dyson that should be heard more often - the Concerto da Chiesa, for instance.
Originally posted by Petrushka View Post[B]George Dyson: Violin Concerto
Premiered at the Proms during the Second World War, this is a gorgeous work, the equal of many more famous VC's and I can't understand it's neglect. It would go down very well at the Proms.
There are so may neglected masterpieces,what is a masterpiece anyway?.
Interesting to note how much British music is quoted on this thread.
A couple I would add are :
Parry 5th Symphony.
Lloyd Symphonic Mass.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Barbirollians View PostDohnanyi's Konzertstuck for Cello and Orchestra.
I would second Parry's symphony No 5 but heavens Stanford's Irish Symphony sounds like a tapestry woven by a musical magpie .
Comment
-
-
Here's an interesting composer: Dittersdorf. He wrote perhaps 120 symphonies (and much more besides) though most are lost, but what remains are often gems. Best-known, I suppose, are the six symphonies on the Metamorphosis of Ovid, which all have almost graphic stories. Try Der Sturz Phaƫtons, if you don't know them. There's good tunes, often unexpected structures (opening with the slow movement, closing with a minuet, etc), and some lovely woodwind writing.
His name was Carl Ditters, but when he was enobled he chose the title 'von Dittersdorf' - rather as if Roy Hudd became Lord Hudd of Huddersfield. I just love that.
Comment
-
Comment