I did a little shopping around last week and bought the Wilhelm Furtwängler Legacy CD box set. It's early days yet and it will be several weeks before I've listen to all of it, but I don't regret buying it even for the few CDs I've already played. I wondered whether it might contain the "complete" Furtwängler, but this is far from the case. The compiler chose one version of each work and sometimes added excerpts from one or two other versions. This seems a reasonable compromise. So we have the Rome Ring cycle, with highlights from the La Scala version. We don't have samples of all 10 "Eroica" recordings - just one or two.
With such a wealth of great performances to look forward to, I wonder whether it is better to listen to the CDs in numerical order, starting with Bach, Handel and Gluck, going on to Beethoven, then Brahms, Bruckner... or to jump around more to provide the ear with greater variety. So far, I'v stuck to the first method, and have heard Furtwängler's Bach recordings for the very first time. It sounded strange hearing Brandenburg 5 with a piano, but in St Matthew Passion WF did use a harpsichord...
With such a wealth of great performances to look forward to, I wonder whether it is better to listen to the CDs in numerical order, starting with Bach, Handel and Gluck, going on to Beethoven, then Brahms, Bruckner... or to jump around more to provide the ear with greater variety. So far, I'v stuck to the first method, and have heard Furtwängler's Bach recordings for the very first time. It sounded strange hearing Brandenburg 5 with a piano, but in St Matthew Passion WF did use a harpsichord...
Comment