Stravinsky: Pulcinella

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Petrushka
    Full Member
    • Nov 2010
    • 12260

    Stravinsky: Pulcinella

    You know how it is sometimes. There's a piece you hardly ever play then you give it an airing and all of a sudden you can't stop playing it!
    Anyway, that's been my recent experience with the complete Pulcinella.

    I've got three recordings: BPO/Haitink, RCO/Chailly and ASMF/Marriner. The Marriner is terrific and sounds as if everyone had a whale of a time making it. With superb characterful singing from Yvonne Kenny, Robert Tear and Robert Lloyd this is my favourite.

    Are there any other recordings I should be listening to?
    "The sound is the handwriting of the conductor" - Bernard Haitink
  • Bryn
    Banned
    • Mar 2007
    • 24688

    #2
    Stravinsky's own is my favourite. I'd suggest keeping well away from the early Rattle recording. I had great hopes which were dashed.

    Comment

    • rauschwerk
      Full Member
      • Nov 2010
      • 1481

      #3
      Abbado, with Teresa Berganza, Ryland Davies and John Shirley-Quirk, has given me much pleasure over the years.

      Comment

      • Don Petter

        #4
        Originally posted by Bryn View Post
        Stravinsky's own is my favourite. I'd suggest keeping well away from the early Rattle recording. I had great hopes which were dashed.
        Stravinsky's own for me too. I prefer the earlier (mono) one to the later one in the big box, though this may be because it's the one I 'learnt on'.

        Comment

        • Roehre

          #5
          Originally posted by Bryn View Post
          Stravinsky's own is my favourite. I'd suggest keeping well away from the early Rattle recording. I had great hopes which were dashed.
          My opinion as well (Rattle's 2 suites for small orchestra aren't much better either).
          Btw, another performance to consider IMO is Abbado/BPO on a late 1970s DGG recording .

          Edit: that's the one Rauschwerk already mentioned.

          Comment

          • HighlandDougie
            Full Member
            • Nov 2010
            • 3093

            #6
            I really enjoy the Yakov Kreizberg/Monte Carlo recording which is very well sung (and played). It's (almost) my local band in France so I'm probably being a little partisan but Kreizberg's 3-disc Diaghilev ballets set is one I play often.

            Comment

            • LeMartinPecheur
              Full Member
              • Apr 2007
              • 4717

              #7
              I have the 70s LSO/Abbado (does Roehre err in saying BPO above?) and Stravinsky's own, and certainly don't feel any urgent need for another. Fantastic work though!
              I keep hitting the Escape key, but I'm still here!

              Comment

              • Ferretfancy
                Full Member
                • Nov 2010
                • 3487

                #8
                Stravinsky for me, but with regard to the suite alone, I still have a fondness for the old Ansermet / Susse Romande version for its nice tuppence coloured recording.

                Comment

                • Roehre

                  #9
                  Originally posted by LeMartinPecheur View Post
                  I have the 70s LSO/Abbado (does Roehre err in saying BPO above?) and Stravinsky's own, and certainly don't feel any urgent need for another. Fantastic work though!
                  You're right LMP. It's the LSO.

                  Comment

                  • verismissimo
                    Full Member
                    • Nov 2010
                    • 2957

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Don Petter View Post
                    Stravinsky's own for me too. I prefer the earlier (mono) one to the later one in the big box, though this may be because it's the one I 'learnt on'.
                    Got out the old Cleveland/Stravinsky mono LP recorded 1953 at your prompting, Don. Lovely.

                    Comment

                    • Serial_Apologist
                      Full Member
                      • Dec 2010
                      • 37710

                      #11
                      Does anyone else think Poulenc couldn't have composed "Les Biches" without I.S. first having composed "Pulcinella"?

                      Comment

                      • ferneyhoughgeliebte
                        Gone fishin'
                        • Sep 2011
                        • 30163

                        #12
                        Originally posted by Serial_Apologist View Post
                        Does anyone else think Poulenc couldn't have composed "Les Biches" without I.S. first having composed "Pulcinella"?
                        I'm not sure Poulenc could've composed anything without Stravinsky first having composed ...

                        (A vicious rumour, no doubt, but isn't IS supposed to have said after adopting Serial practices, "Let's see what Poulenc writes now!")
                        [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

                        Comment

                        • Eine Alpensinfonie
                          Host
                          • Nov 2010
                          • 20570

                          #13
                          Pulcinella's a great work - the first one by Stravinsky that I ever played in, I think.

                          Comment

                          • Serial_Apologist
                            Full Member
                            • Dec 2010
                            • 37710

                            #14
                            Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View Post
                            I'm not sure Poulenc could've composed anything without Stravinsky first having composed ...

                            (A vicious rumour, no doubt, but isn't IS supposed to have said after adopting Serial practices, "Let's see what Poulenc writes now!")

                            Comment

                            • Don Petter

                              #15
                              Originally posted by verismissimo View Post
                              Got out the old Cleveland/Stravinsky mono LP recorded 1953 at your prompting, Don. Lovely.
                              Glad that I'm not the only one, veri, and that it spurred you to listen again!

                              For a long time I despaired of those 'hidden' first mono recordings being issued on CD, but at least some of them were eventually, in 1998, on one of Sony's 'Masterworks Heritage' doubles. I suspect it was not very long-lived, but is well worth seeking out if you get a chance (MH2K 63325).

                              The set is called 'Stravinsky Conducts Stravinsky - The Mono Years 1952-1955', and it contains:

                              Le Baiser de la Fee (complete)
                              Symphony in C, plus rehearsal fragment
                              Pulcinella (complete)
                              L'Hisoire du Soldat (suite)
                              Octet for Winds

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X