I have recently purchased the heavily praised Chandos disc of Delius concertos - with Little/Watkins and Andrew Davis .
None of these three are anywhere near my favourite musicians . Davis strikes me as rather bumptious ( possibly from his Last Night speeches ) and I have really not liked his Elgar especially his recording of the Violin Concerto with Ehnes , Watkins gave a performance of the Elgar Concerto to open the Proms the other year that struck me as bland and emotionless and my last encounter with Little in a concert hall was a Lark Ascending in which there appeared to be intonation problems ( though I enjoyed much of her earlier recorded work) .
I decided that I should buy it against my prejudices . I am rather glad I did . All three strike me as much more to my taste in Delius than in Elgar.The Double Concerto strikes me as a complete success from first note to last , in the Violin Concerto there is a sense of structure that other performances don't have and Little is in good form - I don't think it quite a match for either Pougnet or Ralph Holmes who both play much more dreamily and beautifully to my ears ( I don't know the Sammons ) . As for the Cello Concerto Watkins has restored much of what was cut when the concerto was revised in 1932 (with Delius's approval ) . I have not sat down and compared it with the standard edition as played by Du Pre to see what has changed but it is a very good performance - if not quite as glorious as her version.
Highly recommended - anyone else bought a record against their prejudices and been pleased to have had them confounded ?
None of these three are anywhere near my favourite musicians . Davis strikes me as rather bumptious ( possibly from his Last Night speeches ) and I have really not liked his Elgar especially his recording of the Violin Concerto with Ehnes , Watkins gave a performance of the Elgar Concerto to open the Proms the other year that struck me as bland and emotionless and my last encounter with Little in a concert hall was a Lark Ascending in which there appeared to be intonation problems ( though I enjoyed much of her earlier recorded work) .
I decided that I should buy it against my prejudices . I am rather glad I did . All three strike me as much more to my taste in Delius than in Elgar.The Double Concerto strikes me as a complete success from first note to last , in the Violin Concerto there is a sense of structure that other performances don't have and Little is in good form - I don't think it quite a match for either Pougnet or Ralph Holmes who both play much more dreamily and beautifully to my ears ( I don't know the Sammons ) . As for the Cello Concerto Watkins has restored much of what was cut when the concerto was revised in 1932 (with Delius's approval ) . I have not sat down and compared it with the standard edition as played by Du Pre to see what has changed but it is a very good performance - if not quite as glorious as her version.
Highly recommended - anyone else bought a record against their prejudices and been pleased to have had them confounded ?
Comment