Beethoven Symphony Cycles

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • visualnickmos
    Full Member
    • Nov 2010
    • 3609

    Originally posted by Alison View Post
    Is that first or second Chicago cycle please?
    Solti made TWO Chicago cycles? Can you elucidate..... thanks.
    Last edited by visualnickmos; 16-12-20, 20:01.

    Comment

    • Eine Alpensinfonie
      Host
      • Nov 2010
      • 20568

      Originally posted by barbirollians View Post
      which erich kleiber eroica concertgebouw or vpo ?
      VPO

      All 9.25 symphonies listened to today.

      Comment

      • cloughie
        Full Member
        • Dec 2011
        • 22107

        Originally posted by visualnickmos View Post
        Solti made TWO Chicgao cycles? Can you elucidate..... thanks.
        The analogue version from early 1970s which reputedly included every repeat and the DDD one from the 80s - which I have not heard so cannot comment upon - it is not widely available now except in the complete Chicago box. Being a Soltiphile I would love to have but the big Solti CSO box had too many duplications. Alison or Petrushka I think have the set and may be able to elaborate more on the differences between performances. The VPO, late50s/early 60s performances are typical swift Solti performances, and additionaly there is an LPO mono, early 50s recording on Eloquence.

        Comment

        • visualnickmos
          Full Member
          • Nov 2010
          • 3609

          Originally posted by cloughie View Post
          The analogue version from early 1970s which reputedly included every repeat and the DDD one from the 80s - which I have not heard so cannot comment upon - it is not widely available now except in the complete Chicago box. Being a Soltiphile I would love to have but the big Solti CSO box had too many duplications. Alison or Petrushka I think have the set and may be able to elaborate more on the differences between performances. The VPO, late50s/early 60s performances are typical swift Solti performances, and additionaly there is an LPO mono, early 50s recording on Eloquence.
          Thank you. I too, do not have the later set, but I find the 1970s set a top-drawer cycle. I would still be keen to compare with the later set.

          Comment

          • Bryn
            Banned
            • Mar 2007
            • 24688

            Originally posted by cloughie View Post
            The analogue version from early 1970s which reputedly included every repeat and the DDD one from the 80s - which I have not heard so cannot comment upon - it is not widely available now except in the complete Chicago box. Being a Soltiphile I would love to have but the big Solti CSO box had too many duplications. Alison or Petrushka I think have the set and may be able to elaborate more on the differences between performances. The VPO, late50s/early 60s performances are typical swift Solti performances, and additionally, there is an LPO mono, early 50s recording on Eloquence.
            I'm not too eager to listen to both of Solti's Chicago sets at the moment but it is noticeable that the earlier set has longer durations than the digital recordings.

            Comment

            • cloughie
              Full Member
              • Dec 2011
              • 22107

              Originally posted by visualnickmos View Post
              Thank you. I too, do not have the later set, but I find the 1970s set a top-drawer cycle. I would still be keen to compare with the later set.
              I agree - I remember receiving the 70s LP box and the additional disc with his conversation with William Mann - Even back then I had a duplication problem - the Choral which had been out a year or two earlier spaciously spread on 4 sides.

              Comment

              • cloughie
                Full Member
                • Dec 2011
                • 22107

                Originally posted by Bryn View Post
                I'm not too eager to listen to both of Solti's Chicago sets at the moment but it is noticeable that the earlier set has longer durations than the digital recordings.
                Yes he’d probably decided that one or two repeats weren’t essential and he really let the music breathe in those 70s performances. I’m sure Bryn you would question whether he observed LvB’s metronome suggestions!

                Comment

                • Bryn
                  Banned
                  • Mar 2007
                  • 24688

                  Originally posted by cloughie View Post
                  Yes he’d probably decided that one or two repeats weren’t essential and he really let the music breathe in those 70s performances. I’m sure Bryn you would question whether he observed LvB’s metronome suggestions!
                  Another reason I am not too eager to give time to listening to them.

                  Comment

                  • Eine Alpensinfonie
                    Host
                    • Nov 2010
                    • 20568

                    Originally posted by cloughie View Post
                    I agree - I remember receiving the 70s LP box and the additional disc with his conversation with William Mann - Even back then I had a duplication problem - the Choral which had been out a year or two earlier spaciously spread on 4 sides.
                    That was very extravagant. It was normal to spread it over 3 sides if the side turn in the middle of the 3rd movement was to be avoided. 4-sided 9ths were rare, though the VPO/Erich Kleiber recording was originally issued in this way.

                    The first attempt to cram the work on to a single LP was produced by Vox, with the first 3 movements on side 1, with the finale given the entire side 2.

                    When Decca reissued the analogue Solti recording on a single LP, they fitted movements 3 & 4 on side 2 - and incredible technical achievement. One Gramophone critic joked that the opportunity had been missed to include a filler. EMI responded by issuing Klemperer's recording with the Fidelio Overture preceding the first movement of the symphony, on side 1.

                    Comment

                    • cloughie
                      Full Member
                      • Dec 2011
                      • 22107

                      Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View Post
                      That was very extravagant. It was normal to spread it over 3 sides if the side turn in the middle of the 3rd movement was to be avoided. 4-sided 9ths were rare, though the VPO/Erich Kleiber recording was originally issued in this way.

                      The first attempt to cram the work on to a single LP was produced by Vox, with the first 3 movements on side 1, with the finale given the entire side 2.

                      When Decca reissued the analogue Solti recording on a single LP, they fitted movements 3 & 4 on side 2 - and incredible technical achievement. One Gramophone critic joked that the opportunity had been missed to include a filler. EMI responded by issuing Klemperer's recording with the Fidelio Overture preceding the first movement of the symphony, on 6side 1.
                      Was the Vox Horenstein with the VPM? The other ‘early’ -well mid 60s - movts 1 2 3 on Side 1 -37mins was BSO Munch on RCA Victrola - the Kleiber 9 had three pressings on LXT initially on 4 sides, then 3 sides with the VPO/Schuricht Sym 1 and then on 2 sides - then it appeared on Eclipse with both mono and fake stereo versions.

                      Comment

                      • Barbirollians
                        Full Member
                        • Nov 2010
                        • 11654

                        Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View Post
                        VPO

                        All 9.25 symphonies listened to today.
                        Very wise I reckon I much prefer the VPO I find it the most profound and wonderful recording of the Eroica .

                        Comment

                        • cloughie
                          Full Member
                          • Dec 2011
                          • 22107

                          Originally posted by Barbirollians View Post
                          Very wise I reckon I much prefer the VPO I find it the most profound and wonderful recording of the Eroica .
                          Unless I am just imagining it at the time of its issue on ACL 35 the funeral march was split on to side 2.

                          Comment

                          • Goon525
                            Full Member
                            • Feb 2014
                            • 597

                            If I remember rightly there was a Hallé/Loughran version of the Eroica where Movements 4 and 1 were on one side of the LP, and the middle movements on t’other.

                            Comment

                            • Mario
                              Full Member
                              • Aug 2020
                              • 568

                              Originally posted by Goon525 View Post
                              If I remember rightly there was a Hallé/Loughran version of the Eroica where Movements 4 and 1 were on one side of the LP, and the middle movements on t’other.
                              Absolutely correct Goon525, reviewed by Thomas Heinitz in Records and Recording.

                              The symphony started and finished in the middle track of both sides, necessitating a turnover of the LP twice.

                              Mario

                              Comment

                              • cloughie
                                Full Member
                                • Dec 2011
                                • 22107

                                Originally posted by Goon525 View Post
                                If I remember rightly there was a Hallé/Loughran version of the Eroica where Movements 4 and 1 were on one side of the LP, and the middle movements on t’other.
                                It had a locking groove which prevented deja vu! and it has never been issued on CD!

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X