Originally posted by Beef Oven
View Post
The Death of the CD?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View PostYes I can: the Alphabet's a wonderful thing
Also, in my particular case the storing CDs in alphabetical order broke down as I bought more and more CDs. Too much shuffling of things about for me to keep up. I realise others are more organised than me.Steve
Comment
-
-
Panjandrum
Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View PostYes I can: the Alphabet's a wonderful thing.
News to me: I've been moving them around with me most days for the last quarter century. Pockets and briefcases are also wonderful things. .
Not if you handle them carefully - or, with Fürtwängler's Wagner, all due reverence! .
Comment
-
Originally posted by Panjandrum View PostMulti composer CDs?
Play on the go do they (car cd players excluded)?
As I said: they get scratched.[FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
Comment
-
-
Beef Oven
Cheers - I am going to check more of my old cds now!Originally posted by Stunsworth View PostIt was a well known problem with some CDs pressed by Phillips. There's some more information here on the Hyperion web site...
http://www.hyperion-records.co.uk/bronzed.asp
Comment
-
Should have said - I use XBMC to store and playback the music files - highly recommended (read about it on the Pristine Audio website) and visually a stunner, but, yes, I still often have to adjust the sample rate on the Macbook; I've noticed though, that if you connect your optical cable before switch-on it will still be at 96khz or whatever, if it was at that setting upon switch-off...
Like Beef Oven, I'm happily encumbered with Too Many CDs (all coffee tables submerged long since...), and I'm happy to use discs or downloads... it doesn't have to be an agonised choice!Originally posted by Stunsworth View PostOne slight 'gotcha' with high resolution downloads played via iTunes is that you have to set the bitrate using the audio/midi app before launching iTunes. iTunes uses the bitrate that was in place when the program was launched - even if you later change it to the correct rate. The annoying thing is that the Mac doesn't remember the previous setting if it's restarted and reverts to 44.1/16.
Also if using the wifi method I described above the bit rate is limited to 48/16 as Airplay doesn't support higher resolution recordings. With high resolution downloads becoming more popular among audiophiles I'd expect that to change sooner rather than later. With a wired connection such as yours there's no problem playing them, and I agree they can sound superb.
Comment
-
-
Panjandrum
Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View PostPerformer's/s' name..
I've never felt the need to hear music "on the go" - I prefer to read. .
As I said: not if you handle them carefully.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Panjandrum View PostCDs take up space. You can't find them. They're not portable. They get scratched. And then they don't work. You know.
You can find them unless you are extremely disorganised.
They only get scratched if you are careless.
Every one of my CDs (dating from 1983) works perfectly.
And of course they are portable, being small and light. Even 78s were portable, if a little cumbersome.
We don't want to sound like that absurd Brennan advert.
I do have an iPod, but I use it less and less. It may hold everything, which is extremely clever, but it's less convenient.
Comment
-
-
VodkaDilc
Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View PostThey don't take up much space.
You can find them unless you are extremely disorganised.
They only get scratched if you are careless.
Every one of my CDs (dating from 1983) works perfectly.
And of course they are portable, being small and light. Even 78s were portable, if a little cumbersome.
I am also in the process of having some new shelves built for my collection. Evidence, I think, that Mr Brennan and the Downloads Brigade are getting little interest from this direction. If they stopped manufacturing CDs tomorrow (and they won't), I've still got more than enough to see out my days pleasurably.
Comment
-
Roehre
Originally posted by VodkaDilc View PostIf they stopped manufacturing CDs tomorrow (and they won't), I've still got more than enough to see out my days pleasurably.
Comment
-
Originally posted by VodkaDilc View PostIf they stopped manufacturing CDs tomorrow (and they won't), I've still got more than enough to see out my days pleasurably.
I have over 3000 CDs and simply don't think it's worth the effort to rip them all to PC. I can find CDs quite easily on the shelf but cannot imagine living without a digital database of my collection. I use OrangeCD Catalog on a daily basis and find it to be marvellous. The first thing I do when buy a new CD is download its details and add it to the database. This easily solves the problem of tracking down items from multi-composer discs and compilation boxes. As a Lieder freak I find it indispensable for finding all versions of a specific song.
On the other hand, if I didn't have so many discs or were starting from scratch I would definitely go down the digital storage route.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Panjandrum View PostMulti performers as well as multi composers (not that rare)?
Hotel rooms?
Railway journeys?
At the gym?
Anywhere where there's other people's noise?
CD not much cop there.
Are you a museum curator?
Flippancy aside, I think we have very different needs from Music that our choice of carrier reflects. For me, it is an intense experience to be savoured in the best possible conditions. I tend not to listen casually and cannot "put on" Brahms String Quntets "in the background". I can quite see that, for someone who wants all their Music to accompany them wherever they happen to be, the i-Pod (other portable electronic Music storage devices are available) is a vast improvement on the CD Walkman.
Best Wishes.[FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
Comment
-
-
Panjandrum
Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View PostNone in my collection.
CD "Walkman"
Read books, so as not to disturb fellow travellers!
I can only quote my partner's response:
I don't use Bach to drown out other people's "noise": where do you mean? In a city centre? ("Noise" is part of the fun) At a football match? Dinner with the in-laws?
I think we have very different needs from Music that our choice of carrier reflects.
For me, it is an intense experience to be savoured in the best possible conditions. I tend not to listen casually and cannot "put on" Brahms String Quntets "in the background". I can quite see that, for someone who wants all their Music to accompany them wherever they happen to be, the i-Pod (other portable electronic Music storage devices are available) is a vast improvement on the CD Walkman.
Best Wishes.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Panjandrum View PostSo, you don't, for example have any compilation CDs of string quartets or piano concetos by more than one composer and one performer?
I find that hard to believe.
What about that recording of miscellaneous trumpet works from the 18th century or those 19th century string quartets on Naxos you bought 10 years ago? Sure you can remember the name of the ensemble, even though you've never heard of them since?
Liable to jump and skip (that's the CD player not you)
Get noise cancelling headphones, then you can set at a volume which will not disturb others.
You find the idea of exercise one to be avoided at all costs? That's your choice, but not one conducive to your longevity
I'd rather listen to Bach (or Berio for that matter) than some imbecile ranting on his mobile to all the world.
You obviously have a higher tolerance to unwanted noise than I have.
I am quite capable of intense listening while not necessarily in the ideal audio environment.
Humbug.[FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
Comment
-
Comment