Thx.
Benno Moiseiwitsch
Collapse
X
-
I didn’t have any of those Naxos CDs so started with the Rachmaninov 1 with Sargent from 1948 and BM’s 1930s recordings of the second and Rhapsody .
The sound is remarkably good and the performances are just fabulous Sargent and the Philharmonia as incandescent as the soloist in 1948 . I don’t think I have ever heard a better performance. The second concerto for me took a while to get going . I know the opening movement is marked moderato but it is all rather lugubrious to start with but Moiseiwitsch soon starts ( metaphorically ) singing his heart out at the piano and the rest of the performance is very fine . The Beecham era LPO accompanies conducted by Goehr.
The Rhapsody with the LPO/Cameron is another absolute cracker of a performance but so is the live one with Boult on the Testament disc - I bet it must have been something of an event to hear BM play this live.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Mandryka View PostI'll just use this thread to alert the people who are interested in old piano recordings that APR have just released the complete Robert Lortat -- new transfers I think -- some people would say that he rivals Cortot in Chopin.
Comment
-
-
I first came across Lortat when he was mentioned positively in Charles Timbrell’s book on French Pianism. The quality of the transfers available at that time were so poor that listening was not very enjoyable for me. About two years ago, someone shared an amateur transfer of his waltzes and, for the first time, I could hear why he was so well appreciated. The new APR seems outstanding, I’m listening now to his etudes - a one sided performance, but astonishing music making nonetheless. (I think (but I could be wrong, I can’t find the book, much to my annoyance, to check) that the Etudes were singled out by Timbrell for special praise.)Last edited by Mandryka; 11-09-23, 03:08.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Mandryka View PostI first came across Lortat when he was mentioned positively in Charles Timbrell’s book on French Pianism. The quality of the transfers available at that time were so poor that listening was not very enjoyable for me. About two years ago, someone shared an amateur transfer of his waltzes and, for the first time, I could hear why he was so well appreciated. The new APR seems outstanding, I’m listening now to his etudes - a one sided performance, but astonishing music making nonetheless. (I think (but I could be wrong, I can’t find the book, much to my annoyance, to check) that the Etudes were singled out by Timbrell for special praise.)
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by silvestrione View Post
Lortat on APR is also reviewed (very favourably) by Rob Cowan in this month's Gramophone.
It’s iconoclastic stuff, for a modern audience. Maybe if Lortat had been given a contract with EMI rather than Cortot, we’d all see the music in a different way.
Comment
-
-
A bit of thread drift here . Back to Moiseiwitsch - have listed to his recordings of Tchaikovsky 1 and 2 on Naxos. The review in the Gramophone was sniffy at its tepidity but it sounds as if Alec Robertson had had his ears pinned back by the Horowitz/Toscanini and was not in listening mode.
I thought it was very fine and extremely musical. The Siloti mangling of the Tchaikovsky 2 I have never heard better played - very different to but up there with Cherkassky to my ears.
Comment
-
-
Well I listened to the preludes on the APR transfer (which may be the same as the one on Naxos, I’m not sure.)
He was obviously a pianist which was really concerned about creating a gorgeous sound - it’s a fabulous thing to relish the subtle way he brings our inner voices, the way he voices chords. The sensuality of a piano.
I’d say he was able to do more than that - there’s a variety of touch and there’s a sense of rhythm and pulse. It’s beautiful, but it’s not just beautiful.
Comment
-
Comment