I think my most profound experience with recorded music was with an mp3 derived from a crackly Artur Schnabel 78 recorded in the 1930s, played through some cheap computer speakers. I suspect this may disqualify me from the club.
Are you an audiophile?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Ein Heldenleben View PostAlcohol and drug usually means wanting more for the same effect. An effect difficult to achieve In the audio world .Though rather like class A drugs the price of hifi has come down over the years. What the Far East is to Audio, South America and Afghanistan are to opiates.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Joseph K View PostFWIW I think the division of drugs into classes is not in accordance with reality, and while I took them the price never came down, though maybe you know something I don't?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Ein Heldenleben View PostAlcohol and drug usually means wanting more for the same effect. An effect difficult to achieve In the audio world .Though rather like class A drugs the price of hifi has come down over the years. What the Far East is to Audio, South America and Afghanistan are to opiates.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Master Jacques View PostAudiophilia is an addiction. And as with all addictions, addicts are forced to pay ever more extortionate prices to get their next fix.
Comment
-
-
Thanks, Heldenleben, for that additional anecdote about the Musgrave concerto. I well remember the occasion, the other items on the programme being Walton's 'Capriccio Burlesco' (its British Pemiere, I think) and Elgar 2; the conductor our old friend Colin Davis, not long into his stint as Chief Conductor, BBC SO.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View PostI used to be an audiophile. When CDs came along, it was no longer necessary.
These days I’m a miniature scorephile: they ‘ink in’ what I would otherwise miss.
Comment
-
-
When I started listening to classical music as a teenager in the 60s it was certainly not an audiophile experience. I had a portable radio bought with money saved from my paper round and my parents had one of those radiograms - better sound, but more like furniture than hi-fi. My first audiophile classical experience was probably my first live orchestral concert - a 1968 Prom (this one). We were standing quite close in the Arena and the string sound as the Mozart Symphony began was a revelation to my ears.
As a student I had a more upmarket Roberts radio, but mono only, and it was only in my late 20s, when we bought our first house, that we owned anything remotely hifi, based around the widely recommended NAD 3020 amp. I have never felt the need to go for super hifi, only replacing items when they stopped working. I currently have a Marantz PM6006 amp with Mission 772 speakers which sounds fine by my ears.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by edashtav View PostThese days I’m a miniature scorephile: they ‘ink in’ what I would otherwise miss.It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Comment
-
-
Many years ago I first realised that Hifi offered something worthwhile when I wrapped my two small tinny speakers in towels, leaving the front open, to stop them rattling on the table. They were attached to a Ferguson Music Centre that I had inherited. The speaker boxes were made of hardboard covered in Fablon(?). To my surprise the sound was much improved - I had started on the upgrade path! I still use towels to wrap my two little Tivoli radios in the bedroom, because they have very hard corners which can hurt, rather than for sound quality. Wired in stereo, using an external source, they are pretty good.
I tend to think that much "New" music from the last 70 years is easier to appreciate if your hifi is at least medium quality.
Nowadays I am trying to get the best out of Open Baffle speakers (Linkwitz) - they are quite demanding.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by french frank View PostYes, I think I can 'hear' things better when I can see the score (assuming I haven't lost my place when the repeats are played). Otherwise, am I an audiophile? No, I never have been. I'm sure hearing music on a top end audio system would be a revelation, but it's not the kind of thing I would spend money on. Self-indulgence: I can enjoy music without thinking how my enjoyment would be revolutionised if I shelled out on a better hifi. I mainly listen on my laptop which isn't great audio anyway. A different experience, I'll acknowledge (I do remember hearing my first CD - solo piano music of Satie - and thinking wow). So much resides in the imagination.
Comment
-
-
I’ve gradually upgraded my Hi-Fi over 40 odd years and the set up I have now is probably as good as I’ll ever own unless I win the lottery. I still have the first record player my mother bought after she won £100 on the Premium Bonds in 1967! It was in storage for a long time and I took it out and played it a couple of years ago. It was actually pretty good although I’m glad to have upgraded.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by pastoralguy View PostI’ve gradually upgraded my Hi-Fi over 40 odd years and the set up I have now is probably as good as I’ll ever own unless I win the lottery. I still have the first record player my mother bought after she won £100 on the Premium Bonds in 1967! It was in storage for a long time and I took it out and played it a couple of years ago. It was actually pretty good although I’m glad to have upgraded.
Day to day I'm still wedded to my elderly Quad speakers (63's) and amp.
Comment
-
Comment