In Gramophone he said this last month in an article about the role of the critic
Even legends like Otto Klemperer (who conducted the offstage band under Mahler, for heaven’s sake) can be notoriously cavalier in their approach to the written score. (For the record, Klemperer pretty much ignores most of the aforementioned elements in the first movement of his famous recording of the Resurrection Symphony. Now, there’s a one-tempo view of that movement if ever I heard one. But at the time of its arrival, there wasn’t a whole lot to compare it with and the piece itself – in decent sound for the first time – swept all before it.)
It is far from my favourite recording of Mahler 2 but is this not rewriting history ? Is the sound so much better than Bruno Walter in the late 1950s I don't think so . For those who have access to the score are his criticisms fair ?
P.S Its the soloists I really don't like in this recording.
Even legends like Otto Klemperer (who conducted the offstage band under Mahler, for heaven’s sake) can be notoriously cavalier in their approach to the written score. (For the record, Klemperer pretty much ignores most of the aforementioned elements in the first movement of his famous recording of the Resurrection Symphony. Now, there’s a one-tempo view of that movement if ever I heard one. But at the time of its arrival, there wasn’t a whole lot to compare it with and the piece itself – in decent sound for the first time – swept all before it.)
It is far from my favourite recording of Mahler 2 but is this not rewriting history ? Is the sound so much better than Bruno Walter in the late 1950s I don't think so . For those who have access to the score are his criticisms fair ?
P.S Its the soloists I really don't like in this recording.
Comment