I have now received the CD and played the final movement of Abravanel's Mahler 8. It's certainly not terrible though some aspects of the recording jar a bit with me - such as the close recording of some of the soloists (tenor?). The organ doesn't come through as it does in Solti's and Kubelik's recordings - though that may be fairly realistic given the recording venue. The dynamic range and frequency response sound significantly better than the mp3 version I listened to before. To be sure I suppose I'd have to look at the waveforms from each and do more analysis - that can wait.
This particular work may be one which doesn't work too well in recordings for all sorts of reasons, and as noted earlier it doesn't always do well in live situations - depending on venue. This does veer me more towards thinking that some earlier recordings weren't at all bad, but that the mp3 or other compressed formats which are often used to demonstrate and sell such older recordings more or less kill the sound.
This particular work may be one which doesn't work too well in recordings for all sorts of reasons, and as noted earlier it doesn't always do well in live situations - depending on venue. This does veer me more towards thinking that some earlier recordings weren't at all bad, but that the mp3 or other compressed formats which are often used to demonstrate and sell such older recordings more or less kill the sound.
Comment