Originally posted by Bryn
View Post
Schiff’s Brahms Concertos: Archetypal classics
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View PostBut did he ask for them? I suggest he had to accept what was available.
pitch of the whole, e.g. A 438, 440 etc.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Tony Halstead View PostI'm 99% sure that Bryn was referring to the notes that he intended the pianist and orchestra to play, rather than the overall prevailing
pitch of the whole, e.g. A 438, 440 etc.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Bryn View PostIndeed, though somewhat tongue in cheek, since the type of piano, orchestral complement, the acoustics of the performance venue, etc., all impact upon tempo decisions, though such decisions should also take Brahms's metronome markings as a prime consideration.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Bryn View PostNot as such, just that if one can happily ignore Brahm's metronome indications, why not other aspects of his compositions, such as the pitches, note values, etc.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Bryn View PostNot as such, just that if one can happily ignore Brahm's metronome indications, why not other aspects of his compositions, such as the pitches, note values, etc.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Heldenleben View PostDoes the recording ignore his metronome markings? I’m not that au fait with them. One thing that’s always puzzled be is that the opening B flat chords which are marked staccato with a slur are nearly always played legato ...
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Tony Halstead View PostAre we actually discussing the same piece? The opening B flat is a single solo note played by the 1st horn, not a chord as such. The next 2 notes continue in scale-wise fashion: 'Mice Blind Three', as it were (including the first note); most scores have a slur over these 3 notes. Then the next 3 notes, a triplet quaver group, are marked with a combination of slur and staccato, sometimes called 'mezzo tenuto', 'mezzo staccato' or simply 'portato'. About 50 years ago I had the uncanny experience of being asked by the soloist ( Arthur Rubinstein) and the conductor (Hans Schmidt-Isserstedt) to play the opening 3 notes 'long but articulate' (A.R.) and 'separately tenuto' ( H.S-I). But the next 3 notes were described as 'very smooth' (by both soloist and conductor). Terrifyingly, these requests were made only half an hour before the concert, in Rubinstein's dressing room at the Royal Festival Hall, with the conductor in attendance, nodding sagely as A.R. demonstrated on the little upright piano, while I played the opening in several different ways before it was finally approved. Strangely, there had been no comment at all from either musician in the morning rehearsal! it felt like an audition!
Thanks for the fascinating anecdote - I’m pleased if a possibly naive question has prompted such a fascinating insight into what really goes on! I wonder why they couldn’t just leave you to it...
PS Pretty sure Rubinstein pedals throughout on the RCA recording - I don’t think Schiff does . The horn player on Schiff plays the triplet detached but not quite so much on the Rubinstein.Last edited by Ein Heldenleben; 30-06-21, 20:18.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by pastoralguy View Post
Interestingly, for me at least, Schiff talks about playing both concertos at the Edinburgh Festival with the Philharmonia under Kurt Masur. Iirc, it was 1995 and I remember the Usher Hall being absolutely packed. (I do remember speaking to the leader, Hugh Bean, who must have been nearing the end of his illustrious career. We shook hands and I remember thinking about the artists who must have shaken hands with him!).
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Heldenleben View PostYes it’s great isn’t it. I have a Blüthner (not full size ) about 60 years younger than the one played by Schiiff and the bass is so rich. When I heard the opening D minor solo I recognised the sound immediately. Always wondered whether Brahms played one - kind of made for his music really (and Schumann).
Comment
-
Comment