Although finding storage space (shelf space) for CDs, DVDs and Blu Rays may present problems, problems do not necessarily go away with downloads.
I'm currently downloading several sets recently purchased from Presto. The Kuchar set is going to take up 3.7 Gbytes, while the Alkan set will be 3.1 Gbytes.
At present this machine has over 500 Gbytes of spare space - which I suspect is an under estimate which will sort itself out when MacOS catches up with some large deletions, but even so the immediate download will take up almost 8 Gbytes. If I did this every day it would take about 62 days to completely fill the drive.
Further, I do have more than the current downloads to process.
So my question is really - "are people ignoring the constraints of file store requirements for downloads, and hoping that crashes will never happen, or are they allocating separate storage devices for downloads?"
We may have "solved" one storage problem (space for CDs etc.) and bounced ourselves into another.
I'm currently downloading several sets recently purchased from Presto. The Kuchar set is going to take up 3.7 Gbytes, while the Alkan set will be 3.1 Gbytes.
At present this machine has over 500 Gbytes of spare space - which I suspect is an under estimate which will sort itself out when MacOS catches up with some large deletions, but even so the immediate download will take up almost 8 Gbytes. If I did this every day it would take about 62 days to completely fill the drive.
Further, I do have more than the current downloads to process.
So my question is really - "are people ignoring the constraints of file store requirements for downloads, and hoping that crashes will never happen, or are they allocating separate storage devices for downloads?"
We may have "solved" one storage problem (space for CDs etc.) and bounced ourselves into another.
Comment