Originally posted by Barbirollians
View Post
RR Sept 2019
Collapse
X
-
Let's hope the lickspittles who are currently responsible for R3 programming read these comments, although whether losing (formerly loyal) listeners is more important to them than selling the (false) perception that they are "modernising" the show, I very much doubt.
To get the leading authority on Martinu onto Record Review, and then force him into one of those genteel, populist "five best" exercises (in the style of BBC Music Magazine) was a total waste of a great resource and an insult to the listeners.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Master Jacques View PostLet's hope the lickspittles who are currently responsible for R3 programming read these comments, although whether losing (formerly loyal) listeners is more important to them than selling the (false) perception that they are "modernising" the show, I very much doubt.
To get the leading authority on Martinu onto Record Review, and then force him into one of those genteel, populist "five best" exercises (in the style of BBC Music Magazine) was a total waste of a great resource and an insult to the listeners.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by jayne lee wilson View PostYeah of course, but lists are fun too....come on MJ, give us your High Five... (or one of your many fives...)...
The older I get, the more I dislike lists and league tables. In Art Music, I can see a time where people are only encouraged to listen to the "Top Five" composers. In my own work I've practically given up making comparative judgements, too, because I consider them a lazy way of ranking singers (or composers, or whoever). What's unfailingly interesting is what artists do differently - as many interesting threads on this Forum demonstrate nicely!
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by visualnickmos View PostAbsolutely. Hence my having multiple versions of many works - as many forumists do, of course.
Comment
-
Comment