Seckerson on Prokofiev

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Bryn
    Banned
    • Mar 2007
    • 24688

    #31
    Originally posted by LHC View Post
    Why the reference to Evgeny Svetlanov in the name of the State Academic Symphony Orchestra of Russia? He's not associated with this particular recording. Or is this simply a transcription error from the Amazon listing for this symphony?
    From a quick Google: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_...ian_Federation

    Comment

    • LHC
      Full Member
      • Jan 2011
      • 1561

      #32
      Originally posted by Bryn View Post
      Ah, thanks for this.
      "I do not approve of anything that tampers with natural ignorance. Ignorance is like a delicate exotic fruit; touch it and the bloom is gone. The whole theory of modern education is radically unsound. Fortunately in England, at any rate, education produces no effect whatsoever. If it did, it would prove a serious danger to the upper classes, and probably lead to acts of violence in Grosvenor Square."
      Lady Bracknell The importance of Being Earnest

      Comment

      • Barbirollians
        Full Member
        • Nov 2010
        • 11751

        #33
        My five would be

        1 Piano Concertos 2 & 3 Freddy Kempf

        2 Prokofiev Symphonies - MRSO/Roszdestvensky - thanks to JLW

        3 Prokofiev Violin Concerto No 2 - KWC/Previn

        4 Prokofiev PC No 5 - Richter

        5 Prokofiev - Romeo and Juliet - Previn - I am with ES on this one.

        Comment

        • Parry1912
          Full Member
          • Nov 2010
          • 965

          #34
          Originally posted by Alison View Post
          At least the review of the Blomstedt Ninth didn’t contain his familiar punchline ‘it isn’t Mahler’.
          I see from the latest Gramophone that Seckerson has now set himself up as the the arbiter of what is and isn’t Shostakovich
          Del boy: “Get in, get out, don’t look back. That’s my motto!”

          Comment

          • ferneyhoughgeliebte
            Gone fishin'
            • Sep 2011
            • 30163

            #35
            Originally posted by Parry1912 View Post
            I see from the latest Gramophone that Seckerson has now set himself up as the the arbiter of what is and isn’t Shostakovich
            Well, let's face it, no one else was going to do this!
            [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

            Comment

            • Alison
              Full Member
              • Nov 2010
              • 6468

              #36
              Originally posted by Parry1912 View Post
              I see from the latest Gramophone that Seckerson has now set himself up as the the arbiter of what is and isn’t Shostakovich
              Yes!

              Comment

              Working...
              X