Originally posted by Pulcinella
View Post
Re-recordings: If at first......?
Collapse
X
-
-
-
Originally posted by Boilk View PostThanks Pulcinella, have only just seen your post. I think I got the thread's thrust, but was thinking that sometimes to have 'modern day' digital recordings of works with the same forces could be revelatory in some cases, sometimes putting them in as much of a new light as a more mature conductor's 'rethink'.
I wonder, in Building a Library terms, at what point a recording would enter the 'Historic(al)' category, whether or not the same forces had recorded the work again. Davis's Tippett 2 and 3 would certainly qualify for 'Classic' status.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Pulcinella View Post
I wonder, in Building a Library terms, at what point a recording would enter the 'Historic(al)' category, whether or not the same forces had recorded the work again. Davis's Tippett 2 and 3 would certainly qualify for 'Classic' status.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by BBMmk2 View PostIt’s a bit like referenda, if you don’t like the result of the first one, can we do another?
By the way:
The Oxford English Dictionary states that "Referendums is logically preferable as a plural form meaning ballots on one issue (as a Latin gerund, referendum has no plural). The Latin plural gerundive referenda, meaning things to be referred, necessarily connotes a plurality of issues."
Comment
-
Comment