Originally posted by mikealdren
View Post
Wilhelm Kempff- Beethoven Piano Concertos .
Collapse
X
-
I keep hitting the Escape key, but I'm still here!
-
-
Yes, I started with Gilels no.4 in the late 60s with the others following in the from about 1972: Katchen in No.1, Serkin in No2, Richter in no.3, Gilels and Kempff; all choices greatly influenced by the Stereo Record Guide and Gramophone. I've never found the Serkin or Richter to be very special. Since then I've acquired sets by Kempff, Lewis and Perahia together with sundry concertos by Argerich, Dorfmann, Gavrilov, Gieseking, Michelangeli, Rubinstein and Solomon, more Gilels and Serkin as well as RR's famous Nakajima which never really matched the Kempff in my opinion.
Comment
-
-
Finally bought a second hand double CD set of the Kempff/Leitner cycle . Concertos 1-4. The First is terrific with interesting cadenzas written by Kempff . There is no doubt to my ears that these recordings are more classical in style than the earlier set with van Kempen but none the worse for that.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by richardfinegold View PostI don’t think I’ve ever heard a Kempff Beethoven PC reading. I have the Stereo Sonata set but the PCs aren’t included, unlike the complete Arrau and Schnabel sets that I also own.
Comment
-
-
I've just retrieved the 3-disc set (the 5 concertos + Op 111) from the attic (where it has been mouldering in the 'if anyone wants it, they can have it' box). I can't say that I greatly care for the performance of the 3rd*, not particularly because of Kempff (fine pianist that he is) but rather because of Leitner's rather four-square (dare I say "dull") conducting. I have the van Kempen recordings, both on 10" and 12" LP and on CD - but in Scotland - so no instant comparison to be made. By comparison with, say, Annie Fischer or Maria-Joao Pires, it doesn't set my heather on fire - so back to the attic it goes ....
*better than the 4th, thoughLast edited by HighlandDougie; 28-11-18, 18:04.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by HighlandDougie View PostI've just retrieved the 3-disc set (the 5 concertos + Op 111) from the attic (where it has been mouldering in the 'if anyone wants it, they can have it' box). I can't say that I greatly care for the performance of the 3rd*, not particularly because of Kempff (fine pianist that he is) but rather because of Leitner's rather four-square (dare I say "dull") conducting. I have the van Kempen recordings, both on 10" and 12" LP and on CD - but in Scotland - so no instant comparison to be made. By comparison with, say, Annie Fischer or Maria-Joao Pires, it doesn't set my heather on fire - so back to the attic it goes ....
*better than the 4th, though
As for the Third - the Annie Fischer/Fricsay is top of my list too with Giles/Szell and Solomon close behind.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Barbirollians View PostI can’t agree - like fhgl above I think this is a magical account of the Fourth.
As for the Third - the Annie Fischer/Fricsay is top of my list too with Giles/Szell and Solomon close behind.
There are others which I think I like as much or better - depending on the day.
Comment
-
Comment