I'm a latecomer to these highly-rated recordings, having just relieved a local HMV of the 38-41 set for a fiver IMO they are as good as everyone says, but I'm very, very surprised by their sound, which I don't recall getting any mention in reviews.
First impressions are of a great big orchestra rather like, say, Walter, Klemperer, Bohm, or even Karajan(). It's still well-balanced, everything can be heard, esp. the brass (every entry really thrilling), but it was a real shock to count the players in the photo and make it only 27.
The clue is probably in the very long reverberation clearly audible after any loud concluding chord - a couple of seconds at least. The recordings were made at City Halls, Glasgow - is this known for its bathroom acoustics??
Does this odd choice of venue and acoustic perspective make better sense on SACD? Is it a standard Linn trick? I'd be delighted to hear others' views.
First impressions are of a great big orchestra rather like, say, Walter, Klemperer, Bohm, or even Karajan(). It's still well-balanced, everything can be heard, esp. the brass (every entry really thrilling), but it was a real shock to count the players in the photo and make it only 27.
The clue is probably in the very long reverberation clearly audible after any loud concluding chord - a couple of seconds at least. The recordings were made at City Halls, Glasgow - is this known for its bathroom acoustics??
Does this odd choice of venue and acoustic perspective make better sense on SACD? Is it a standard Linn trick? I'd be delighted to hear others' views.
Comment