Boult's Elgar symphonies

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Barbirollians
    Full Member
    • Nov 2010
    • 11679

    Boult's Elgar symphonies

    I have all his EMI recordings plus the sensational Proms 1 and very good 2 - are the Lyrita recordings essential ? I have a vague recollection that Boult was unhappy at not being able to divide his violins ?

    Any views ?
  • pastoralguy
    Full Member
    • Nov 2010
    • 7758

    #2
    I have that cd so I really must listen to it. I really wish EMI would release Boult's Elgar Second Symphony that he recorded with the Scottish National Orchestra in 1964. Afaik, it's never made it to cd.

    Comment

    • Petrushka
      Full Member
      • Nov 2010
      • 12247

      #3
      Originally posted by Barbirollians View Post
      I have all his EMI recordings plus the sensational Proms 1 and very good 2 - are the Lyrita recordings essential ? I have a vague recollection that Boult was unhappy at not being able to divide his violins ?

      Any views ?
      In my opinion the Lyrita issues are finer than the EMI recordings made later. Yes, Boult was persuaded against his better judgement to have all of the violins to one side and it seems as if he vented his frustration in a more than usually fiery interpretation of the Second. I wouldn't want to be without Boult in Elgar and these 1968 recordings catch him at just the right time before old age crept in. Essential? Yes I rather think they are.
      "The sound is the handwriting of the conductor" - Bernard Haitink

      Comment

      • Barbirollians
        Full Member
        • Nov 2010
        • 11679

        #4
        Originally posted by pastoralguy View Post
        I have that cd so I really must listen to it. I really wish EMI would release Boult's Elgar Second Symphony that he recorded with the Scottish National Orchestra in 1964. Afaik, it's never made it to cd.
        That was on Waverley Records according to the Gramophone review .were they acquired by EMI ?

        Comment

        • Pabmusic
          Full Member
          • May 2011
          • 5537

          #5
          Originally posted by Barbirollians View Post
          That was on Waverley Records according to the Gramophone review .were they acquired by EMI ?
          It was issued on a CfP LP in the 1970s.

          Has anyone mentioned the 1950s Westminster 2nd Symphony? That's been on CD.

          He made 5 studio recordings of no. 2, 4 of no. 1.
          Last edited by Pabmusic; 30-05-17, 21:52.

          Comment

          • Bryn
            Banned
            • Mar 2007
            • 24688

            #6
            Originally posted by Barbirollians View Post
            That was on Waverley Records according to the Gramophone review .were they acquired by EMI ?


            See reference to "Parent Label".

            Comment

            • Barbirollians
              Full Member
              • Nov 2010
              • 11679

              #7
              Odd then that it was not included in the Complete EMI Recordings of Elgar box of Boult recordings .

              Comment

              • cloughie
                Full Member
                • Dec 2011
                • 22119

                #8
                Originally posted by Pabmusic View Post
                It was issued on a CfP LP in the 1970s.

                Has anyone mentioned the 1950s Westminster 2nd Symphony? That's been on CD.

                He made 5 studio recordings os 2, 4 of 1.
                The Nixa-Westminster is on PVCD8382 and recorded in 1956 in stereo, released in USA on Westminster and mixed for mono for British release on Nixa. It was later released on Golden Guinea in stereo. An excellent performance. Who owns the recording now? Well EMI acquired the old Pye catalogue and some of it wwas reissued on Phoenixa CDs, but since the Warner inheritance of EMI classical stuff, who knows?

                Comment

                • Pabmusic
                  Full Member
                  • May 2011
                  • 5537

                  #9
                  Originally posted by cloughie View Post
                  The Nixa-Westminster is on PVCD8382 and recorded in 1956 in stereo, released in USA on Westminster and mixed for mono for British release on Nixa. It was later released on Golden Guinea in stereo. An excellent performance.

                  Comment

                  • EdgeleyRob
                    Guest
                    • Nov 2010
                    • 12180

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Barbirollians View Post
                    I have all his EMI recordings plus the sensational Proms 1 and very good 2 - are the Lyrita recordings essential ? I have a vague recollection that Boult was unhappy at not being able to divide his violins ?

                    Any views ?
                    Yes

                    Comment

                    • cloughie
                      Full Member
                      • Dec 2011
                      • 22119

                      #11
                      Originally posted by EdgeleyRob View Post
                      Yes

                      Comment

                      • Barbirollians
                        Full Member
                        • Nov 2010
                        • 11679

                        #12
                        Ok am convinced - duly ordered .

                        Comment

                        • Barbirollians
                          Full Member
                          • Nov 2010
                          • 11679

                          #13
                          I am rather underwhelmed by these recordings so far . There is a narrowness about the aural perspective that I find a bit off putting and although they have many of Boult's usual virtues they seem to me to lack vim compared to my favourite Boult recordings of these works . The sensational late Proms recording of No in 1976 and the 1944 Elgar 2 which I have always loved since buying it on HMV Treasury on cassette in the 1980s .

                          Comment

                          • Eine Alpensinfonie
                            Host
                            • Nov 2010
                            • 20570

                            #14
                            As interpretations, I think the Lyrita versions are Boult's pinnacle in these works, and I've never been bothered one way or the other re the divided strings.

                            However, I just wish the Halle Orchestra would not divide their violins in the Bridgewater Hall. It just makes the seconds sound weaker.

                            Comment

                            • Petrushka
                              Full Member
                              • Nov 2010
                              • 12247

                              #15
                              Originally posted by Barbirollians View Post
                              I am rather underwhelmed by these recordings so far . There is a narrowness about the aural perspective that I find a bit off putting and although they have many of Boult's usual virtues they seem to me to lack vim compared to my favourite Boult recordings of these works . The sensational late Proms recording of No in 1976 and the 1944 Elgar 2 which I have always loved since buying it on HMV Treasury on cassette in the 1980s .
                              My reaction on hearing these Boult performances for the first time couldn't have been more different. Yes, the live Proms performances from 1976 and 1977 have an extra frisson of excitement but have to agree with EA that the Lyrita recordings represent the pinnacle of Boult's achievement in these works.
                              "The sound is the handwriting of the conductor" - Bernard Haitink

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X