Well, with a few reservations, the great Roger Nichols liked that Berlin/Abbado version very much, which is more than good enough for me!
These things are evidently subjective, but I feel a serious listener has to at least take that particular poetic fin-de-siècle/ Debussian orchestral aesthetic into account, whatever she chooses to do with her auditory perceptions afterward. All shall have prizes doesn't really work for me here. (It isn't a strict dichotomy of course; just the need for the contrast - in performance - across the continuum of perception, from amorphous to precise and sharp)...
Turning pedant for a moment - my first thesis was actually on Mallarmé (written in French for God's sake, well beyond me now) so I always feel very aware of, and close to, that fluid, exciting, evolving aesthetic leading into various shades of modernism, very live at that historical moment.... ( and I brought music in wherever I could of course...!)
These things are evidently subjective, but I feel a serious listener has to at least take that particular poetic fin-de-siècle/ Debussian orchestral aesthetic into account, whatever she chooses to do with her auditory perceptions afterward. All shall have prizes doesn't really work for me here. (It isn't a strict dichotomy of course; just the need for the contrast - in performance - across the continuum of perception, from amorphous to precise and sharp)...
Turning pedant for a moment - my first thesis was actually on Mallarmé (written in French for God's sake, well beyond me now) so I always feel very aware of, and close to, that fluid, exciting, evolving aesthetic leading into various shades of modernism, very live at that historical moment.... ( and I brought music in wherever I could of course...!)
Comment