I don't think you need to worry too much about the performances themselves. These are mostly good. It's whether or not the artificially tweaked sound balances get under your skin that could be an issue for some.
The Glory of Decca Phase4---Hmmm!
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by VodkaDilc View PostI have dithered about buying this set - the views did not seem very positive here. However the very full review in the current IRR (by one of our contributors, I think) has filled me with enthusism and I am about to order it. At about £2 a CD I can put up with a few duds.
As an after-thought, isn't it noticeable that the sort of enthusiastic and thorough reviews we get in IRR are far more likely to send the reader to the record shop (or website) than the Ivan March style blandness of most reviews in other publications?
Comment
-
-
VodkaDilc
Originally posted by cloughie View PostThere is a lot more to like than dislike - the price seems to have risen since first released - I purchased from amazon.it which at the time was the best deal.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View PostI don't think you need to worry too much about the performances themselves. These are mostly good. It's whether or not the artificially tweaked sound balances get under your skin that could be an issue for some.
Comment
-
-
VodkaDilc
Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View PostI don't think you need to worry too much about the performances themselves. These are mostly good. It's whether or not the artificially tweaked sound balances get under your skin that could be an issue for some.
The Phase 4 recordings process..........produced results that were often thrilling. What they are not ..........is 'realistic', but I'm not sure this matters. While the results from the relatively austere approach of a company like Mercury (using just three microphones) are still hugely impressive and can lay claim to some sort of quest for recorded naturalism, even these don't sound 'realistic' in the way an orchestra playing in a live hall is.
No recording sounds exactly like a live performance; the Phase 4 experiment was just one way of presenting the sound.
Comment
-
[QUOTE=VodkaDilc;450498]I liked Nigel Simeone's comment on this issue in IRR:
The Phase 4 recordings process..........produced results that were often thrilling. What they are not ..........is 'realistic', but I'm not sure this matters. While the results from the relatively austere approach of a company like Mercury (using just three microphones) are still hugely impressive and can lay claim to some sort of quest for recorded naturalism, even these don't sound 'realistic' in the way an orchestra playing in a live hall is.
No recording sounds exactly like a live performance
Comment
-
-
The Stokowski Phase 4 recording of Berlioz's Fantastic Symphony is one of the gems of the box. On the microscopic sleeve note is an explanatory box:
For all that Hector Berlioz was a composer far ahead of his time, he couldn't foresee the advent of microgroove recordings, and thus was most inconsiderate to 20th century stereophiles. the five movements of his Symphonie Fantastique are so timed that to put any three of them in sequence on a single side would inevitably result in overcrowding and, consequently, a loss of fidelity. This would be bad enough on a regular recording, but it is unthinkable for Phase 4 stereo - for so many years the standard of immaculate reproduction. Accordingly, the middle movement has been split over two sides, giving the shepherds a chance to catch their breaths, and the listener an opportunity to hear the Symphonie in its full sonic glory.
Comment
-
-
Roehre
Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View PostThe Stokowski Phase 4 recording of Berlioz's Fantastic Symphony is one of the gems of the box. On the microscopic sleeve note is an explanatory box:
Fair enough, but only a few short months later, Stokowski's Beethoven 9 was released on a single Phase 4 LP - something that was by no means the standard for conventional recordings at that time.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Tony View Post
IMV the Nimbus 'Ambisonic' recordings are about as close as you can get...BUT you have to have TWO AMPLIFIERS, FOUR LOUDSPEAKERS and an 'AMBISONIC' DECODER!
Comment
-
-
VodkaDilc
Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View PostAs a postscript to the the above, there is a truly dreadful Stokowski disc in the set - excerpts from Swan Lake and Sleeping Beauty. Not only it is tastelessly recorded, but Stoko's cuts make the result even less than bleeding chunks - more like offal. A horrendous bunch of leftovers.
Comment
Comment