Originally posted by richardfinegold
View Post
Karl Bohm's DG Bruckner 8
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by mathias broucek View PostSome would argue the precise opposite of course.... #thosemissingbarsarequitenice
With Jochum there's the same Haas/Novak thing. The decent sound stereo recordings (Berlin, Dresden, RCO, Bamberg) are all Novak whereas his 1949 DG 8th in Hamburg and the live Frankfurt recording on Tahra are Haas
... the only answer, obvi, is to get ALL performances with conductors/orchestras you like, so that over time you will acquire all variant Haas/Novak/ other 'versions'. And then listen to them, lots, (preferably avec scores of the various editions). You may then begin to approximate (ain't infinitesimal calculus great?) an understanding of what these works might ultimately 'be' (I use the term loosely). And, with any luck, you might get great joy in the process...
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Petrushka View PostThere are, I think. four extant Furtwangler performances of the Bruckner 8, available on various labels, none of them, alas, in terribly good sound. By far the best, in my view, is the earliest of them, a recording made in the Musikverein with the VPO for the Reichsrundfunk on October 17 1944 (70 years ago this Friday) and I'm guessing that this is the one you mean. It is a blistering performance at white heat with the slightly acid sound actually aiding that impression. The trumpet fanfare at the first movement climax cries into the abyss as no other version does. The recording is worth hearing for that moment alone.
Two other recordings date from March 14 1949 (indifferent sound) and the following day (intrusive audience) both with the BPO. Another one from the VPO dates from 1954 (on the Andante label) in execrable sound.
If it's Furtwangler you want in the Bruckner 8, go for the 1944 recording. There is no question, in my opinion, that the circumstances surrounding the date of this recording played a major part in the interpretation that Furtwangler gave us. The Adagio is a lament for a destroyed Germany and its culture every bit as moving as Strauss's Metamorphosen being composed at much the same time. I'll be playing this Bruckner 8 on Friday.
The performance is as you describe. I am in awe of your knowledge of Furtwangler's recorded legacy.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Petrushka View PostThere are, I think. four extant Furtwangler performances of the Bruckner 8, available on various labels, none of them, alas, in terribly good sound. By far the best, in my view, is the earliest of them, a recording made in the Musikverein with the VPO for the Reichsrundfunk on October 17 1944 (70 years ago this Friday) and I'm guessing that this is the one you mean. It is a blistering performance at white heat with the slightly acid sound actually aiding that impression. The trumpet fanfare at the first movement climax cries into the abyss as no other version does. The recording is worth hearing for that moment alone.
Two other recordings date from March 14 1949 (indifferent sound) and the following day (intrusive audience) both with the BPO. Another one from the VPO dates from 1954 (on the Andante label) in execrable sound.
If it's Furtwangler you want in the Bruckner 8, go for the 1944 recording. There is no question, in my opinion, that the circumstances surrounding the date of this recording played a major part in the interpretation that Furtwangler gave us. The Adagio is a lament for a destroyed Germany and its culture every bit as moving as Strauss's Metamorphosen being composed at much the same time. I'll be playing this Bruckner 8 on Friday.
Despite the relatively poor quality of sound, Furtwangler's wartime Bruckner is quite unique and will surely be a treasured part of any devoted Brucknerian's collection.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by richardfinegold View PostOf greater import, the sound quality is imo, superb for a recording of such vintage, much better than the Furtwangler Brahms and Beethoven recordings that I have that come from WWII era performances.
The performance is as you describe.Last edited by HighlandDougie; 17-10-14, 11:55.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by HighlandDougie View PostI have two copies: that in the DG Originals box devoted to WF and the other (Music and Arts CD 764) which contains a health warning - "These wartime Magnetophon tape recordings by the RRG had flutter, hiss, and peak distortion. This CD is not recommended for listeners primarily interested in good sound; it is aimed at discriminating collectors interested in performance traditions" - which was nice of M&A but is not really necessary. As Richard says, the recording sounds remarkably good, better to my ears in the M&A issue than the DG - there is the occasional bit of tape flutter but it captures the fine acoustic of the Musikverein very well. And the performance!! "Blistering" is the word. All others really do pale by comparison.
I also have both of these copies and agree that the Music & Arts issue is to be preferred. http://www.amazon.co.uk/Symphony-No-...ngler+bruckner
The sound in either issue is very fine for the period and I'd urge anyone who is intrigued by the comments on this thread to investigate. The version is basically that of Robert Haas but in the words of Hans-Hubert Schönzeler in his sleeve note to the Unicorn LP issue, 'Furtwangler is apt to make minor alterations of his own, such as the addition of a timpani roll in bars 239/240 of the [first] movement which does not form part of any of the existing printed scores of the work. But under his hands these minor deviations become so entirely convincing that any criticism on these grounds would be completely misplaced'.
The Unicorn LP was my first ever Bruckner recording, purchased 40 years ago, and I have it with me now as I type.Last edited by Petrushka; 17-10-14, 18:21."The sound is the handwriting of the conductor" - Bernard Haitink
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by HighlandDougie View PostI have two copies: that in the DG Originals box devoted to WF and the other (Music and Arts CD 764) which contains a health warning - "These wartime Magnetophon tape recordings by the RRG had flutter, hiss, and peak distortion. This CD is not recommended for listeners primarily interested in good sound; it is aimed at discriminating collectors interested in performance traditions" - which was nice of M&A but is not really necessary. As Richard says, the recording sounds remarkably good, better to my ears in the M&A issue than the DG - there is the occasional bit of tape flutter but it captures the fine acoustic of the Musikverein very well. And the performance!! "Blistering" is the word. All others really do pale by comparison.
I really do have a hard time listening to any other recording of the piece (and I have versions by Karajan, Joachim, Horenstein, Tintner, and Wand). I usually find myself yearning for the Furtwangler long before the finale of the others
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Barbirollians View PostI don't believe it !
A third copy of Bruckner 8 Bohm ordered from an amazon marketplace seller has got lost in the post . There is obviously someone out there who thinks I should not have this recording !!!
Comment
-
-
slarty
Originally posted by Barbirollians View PostIt seems that there is a coding error on Amazon and if you order the Bohm Bruckner 8 you get Julio Iglesias by mistake !
I am not re-ordering until they have corrected it .
Comment
-
Originally posted by hafod View PostYou are not alone! I ordered a copy of the Bohm/Bruckner 8th on 5 August from Zoverstocks for £1.38 that failed to arrive. On 23 September I found another marketplace seller (CD Wonder) offering it for 11p. That too was swallowed up in the mail."Let me have my own way in exactly everything, and a sunnier and more pleasant creature does not exist." Thomas Carlyle
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Barbirollians View PostI don't believe it !
A third copy of Bruckner 8 Bohm ordered from an amazon marketplace seller has got lost in the post . There is obviously someone out there who thinks I should not have this recording !!!
Comment
-
Comment