Tom Courtenay is ...

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Stillhomewardbound
    Full Member
    • Nov 2010
    • 1109

    Tom Courtenay is ...

    ... currently presenting a most enjoyable selection of pieces on Saturday Classics. Very Radio 3 of old!!
  • Anna

    #2
    Totally agree - I was worried as it's under the Sound of the Cinema banner and he started with Dr. Zhivago (tbh I didn't know he was in in) but it's a good programme, very enjoyable, good mix of non-film music.

    Comment

    • Dave2002
      Full Member
      • Dec 2010
      • 17865

      #3
      Anna

      Courtenay = Pasha Antipov / Strelnikov. Maybe you should watch it again - I think it stands a few repeats.

      Comment

      • Norfolk Born

        #4
        I, too, quite enjoyed his selection, but thought there were too many 'bleeding chunks' torn from major works. This, and the frequent reminders of his name, led me to believe that it was meant to serve as an 'entry level' programme - in which case I hope it succeeded.
        If you take the 'Radio Times', you will have noticed (and if you don't, you may well have suspected, or deduced) that Essential Classics is now officially segmented - or do I mean fragmented:
        0900 Essential CD of the Week
        0930 The daily brain teaser
        1000 Artist of the Week
        1030 Guest of the Week
        1100 Host's Essential Choice
        On Mondays, there is also the Building a Library recommendation
        This week, the essential choices - which occupy the longest segment - could fairly be described as 'risk-averse': Brahms 2nd piano concerto, Britten Serenade, Mozart 'Prague' symphony, Schubert 'Unfinished'.

        Comment

        • french frank
          Administrator/Moderator
          • Feb 2007
          • 29514

          #5
          Originally posted by Norfolk Born View Post
          This, and the frequent reminders of his name, led me to believe that it was meant to serve as an 'entry level' programme
          Correct. I've just located an online document (2011) for Radio 3 which says:

          "Notable Service Developments

          Develop the station's accessibility: The station has continued to develop its accessibility particularly through Breakfast, In Tune and Saturday Classics. BBC Radio 3 is introducing listeners to some of the most seminal pieces of the 20th century in Hear and Now."

          Hmm, Breakfast 16 hrs 30 mins per week, In Tune approx 10 hours per week, Saturday Classics, 2 hours per week; Hear and Now 1-2 hours per week (hardly on the same plane?). Just enough to fool people that it's providing serious, challenging programmes.
          It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

          Comment

          • AjAjAjH
            Full Member
            • Nov 2010
            • 209

            #6
            Originally posted by Anna View Post
            I was worried as it's under the Sound of the Cinema banner
            Worried!?

            So what was wrong with the Sound of the Cinema?

            I found it thoroughly enjoyable and taking my daughter to 'Music of the Cinema' concerts was her way into 'Classical' concerts.
            Last edited by AjAjAjH; 08-10-13, 17:22. Reason: my computor doesn#t always do what I tell it to. and has a mind of its own

            Comment

            • french frank
              Administrator/Moderator
              • Feb 2007
              • 29514

              #7
              Originally posted by AjAjAjH View Post
              So what was wrong with the Sound of the Cinema?

              I found it thoroughly enjoyable and taking my daughter to 'Music of the Cinema' concerts was her way into 'Classical' concerts.
              I'd say there was nothing wrong with the idea per se. But three weeks of saturation coverage so that whatever time you turned on you could be pretty sure film music was being discussed was what was wrong. That was longer than Beethoven, Bach, Schubert or Mozart got for their 'special events'.

              But you're on the right lines: it was aimed at people who are not 'the station's natural listeners' according to the event's architect. Even so, a three-week saturation season for people who aren't natural Radio 3 listeners does prompt certain questions. Like, would Radio 4 put on three weeks of 'The Beautiful Game' for people who like football?
              It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

              Comment

              • Norfolk Born

                #8
                Originally posted by french frank View Post
                I'd say there was nothing wrong with the idea per se. But three weeks of saturation coverage so that whatever time you turned on you could be pretty sure film music was being discussed was what was wrong. That was longer than Beethoven, Bach, Schubert or Mozart got for their 'special events'.
                Quite....and IMHO the choice of John Williams as Composer of the Week merely served to prove that regurgitation pays off.

                Comment

                Working...
                X