Originally posted by Radio64
View Post
In Tune
Collapse
X
-
And an enthusiastic third rec for his Goldbergs: stimulating, quirky, beautiful. He's a wonderful writer, too - lots of good reading on his blog, think denk, though he doesn't seem to be doing any writing there these days.
Comment
-
-
Sharky
I was inspired to finally register for the forum by accidentally listening to the first half hour of In Tune this afternoon.
The interview with the composer of tonight's live premiere was mainly about the name of his cat. The later article about digitising old recordings sounded interesting and I was excited to hear Louis Armstrong live in Manchester from 1962...for ten seconds before it was faded out. Then ten seconds of Figaro...
Presumably this short attention span nonsense must be motivated by some spurious research or other suggesting we can't possibly listen to anything longer than two minutes long?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sharky View PostPresumably this short attention span nonsense must be motivated by some spurious research or other suggesting we can't possibly listen to anything longer than two minutes long?
Comment
-
-
Don Petter
Originally posted by Sharky View PostPresumably this short attention span nonsense must be motivated by some spurious research or other suggesting we can't possibly listen to anything longer than two minutes long?
(But, we'd understand you better if you could break that long sentence down into smaller pieces. )
Comment
-
this might amuse - a bit of Mickeysoft 'research' aimed at the advertising 'industry'
One key point
Overall, digital lifestyles deplete the ability to remain focused on a single task, particularly in non-digital environments.
or as a commentator paraphrases it
While people could focus on a task for 12 seconds back in 2000, that figure dropped to 8 seconds in 2013 -- about one second less than a goldfish.
thus in-tune is merely going after the multitasking digital generation who like goldfish swim around in a confined environment into which they defecate
Comment
-
-
Sharky
Originally posted by Don Petter View PostWelcome!
(But, we'd understand you better if you could break that long sentence down into smaller pieces. )
(In hindsight, it was a bit of a mangled sentence.)
I grumbled a while ago to a friend who works in TV about the constant plenaries on documentaries. "We've seen how..." - yes we know, it was five minutes ago.
He mumbled something about short attention spans and channel-hopping, which seems like something of a self-fulfilling belief for broadcasters to hold.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View PostI stumbled on the programme this afternoon, just at the point of the chummy handover. SR did his "I want to be popular" bit with the Hay-on-Wye tent audience. When he succeeded in this venture, the speaker grill in my car actually appeared to have a smug smile on it.I keep hitting the Escape key, but I'm still here!
Comment
-
-
I think that if LeMartinPecheur et Eine Alpensinfonie had listened to the content of Tuesday's InTune they would have been pleasantly surprised. Lonnie Johnson would have been a welcome addition to the programme - as was Mary O'Hara, sans harp, in a vintage recording; but the quality and variety of the literary and musical talent in the tent was superb and Sean Rafferty was in his element in such company.
I hate to see Sean Rafferty disrespected.
Comment
-
-
I hate to see Sean Rafferty disrespected.
IMV he is one of the great 'professionals'.
Quite a few years ago when I was in Belfast conducting the Ulster Orchestra I was 'summoned' to the BBC Studios there for a 'live' interview with SR, however, the 'BBC taxi' that picked me up from my hotel was a few minutes late and - what with Belfast 4.30pm traffic, I ended up about 15 minutes late ...!
'Cooly professional' as always, SR played one of my CDs of the J.C.Bach 'Berlin' harpsichord concertos ( 15 minutes long) until I finally got there!
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Padraig View PostI think that if LeMartinPecheur et Eine Alpensinfonie had listened to the content of Tuesday's InTune they would have been pleasantly surprised. Lonnie Johnson would have been a welcome addition to the programme - as was Mary O'Hara, sans harp, in a vintage recording; but the quality and variety of the literary and musical talent in the tent was superb and Sean Rafferty was in his element in such company.
I hate to see Sean Rafferty disrespected.
And Tony, I don't doubt that SR is a decent and considerate person. But the issue here is the presentation style, and it's that, not the man, that is the main problem (though he does sound smug to me….)
Comment
-
Comment