So wither the art of interpretation..?
Rob's 'Essential Choice'
Collapse
X
-
old khayyam
-
amateur51
Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View Postanton and aeolium's posts have reminded me how good Casals was playing Schubert as a member of a chamber ensemble (there's also a very good recording of the Fifth Symphony that he conducts with the Marlboro Festival Orchestra).
I just don't like his solo Bach recordings.
(I love Edwin Fischer's, though, and Menuhin's ... and the Busch Ensemble's Brandenburgs)
Glad you like Edwin Fischer et al too
Do you know Feinberg's Bach on piano? Very old-fashioned but :swoon:
Comment
-
Originally posted by amateur51 View PostThere's a wonderful CD of his conducting Schubert symphony no 8 (Unfinished) that is sometimes available on Sony, ferney.)
Do you know Feinberg's Bach on piano? Very old-fashioned but :swoon:Playing him now, courtesy of youTube - Bach played as if it were Brahms: LOVE it!
[FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
Comment
-
-
old khayyam
Originally posted by LeMartinPecheur View Postok: perhaps you mean 'whither'? But then again, perhaps notThough the imperative mood seems a bit OTT!
To bend to a prevailing wind which suddenly declares a certain artist no longer a genius smacks of what they call 'fickle trendiness'. It can be the case that some composers only appear to be geniuses within the frame of their particular time (eg, when they are merely advancing an already established change), but when it comes to recitalists interpreting music already centuries old, we can never say their interpretation has lost its validity, only that we have grown bored of it at this current time.
Ultimately, recitation in its purest sense is clinical. Interpretation is... . . . life!
Comment
-
Originally posted by old khayyam View PostTo bend to a prevailing wind which suddenly declares a certain artist no longer a genius smacks of what they call 'fickle trendiness'. It can be the case that some composers only appear to be geniuses within the frame of their particular time (eg, when they are merely advancing an already established change), but when it comes to recitalists interpreting music already centuries old, we can never say their interpretation has lost its validity, only that we have grown bored of it at this current time.
Ultimately, recitation in its purest sense is clinical. Interpretation is... . . . life!I keep hitting the Escape key, but I'm still here!
Comment
-
Comment