A good presenter

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • french frank
    Administrator/Moderator
    • Feb 2007
    • 30316

    #76
    Originally posted by LMcD View Post
    The increase in presenter-less programmes as from early March was apparently a response to falling listener numbers.
    That's a bit ambiguous. Did the falling listener numbers mean they had to cut costs by sacking their presenters, or did they get the sack because they were causing people to switch off?
    It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

    Comment

    • Old Grumpy
      Full Member
      • Jan 2011
      • 3617

      #77

      That's a bit ambiguous. Did the falling listener numbers mean they had to cut costs by sacking their presenters, or did they get the sack because they were causing people to switch off?

      I would imagine the former, but who knows?

      Comment

      • LMcD
        Full Member
        • Sep 2017
        • 8483

        #78
        Originally posted by french frank View Post

        That's a bit ambiguous. Did the falling listener numbers mean they had to cut costs by sacking their presenters, or did they get the sack because they were causing people to switch off?
        According to an article in the Telegraph, the station's schedule is 'evolving' is response to a fall in listener numbers, one benefit of said evolution being 'more music' for listeners.

        Comment

        • antongould
          Full Member
          • Nov 2010
          • 8790

          #79
          Originally posted by Old Grumpy View Post


          I would imagine the former, but who knows?
          indeed but I suppose falling listener numbers means less advertising revenue …..

          Comment

          • cloughie
            Full Member
            • Dec 2011
            • 22128

            #80
            Originally posted by LMcD View Post

            According to an article in the Telegraph, the station's schedule is 'evolving' is response to a fall in listener numbers, one benefit of said evolution being 'more music' for listeners.
            I don’t know anyone who listens to Scala, or of a real reason for its existence.

            Comment

            • oddoneout
              Full Member
              • Nov 2015
              • 9208

              #81
              Originally posted by antongould View Post

              indeed but I suppose falling listener numbers means less advertising revenue …..
              When you have so few listeners in the first place losing a few thousand makes a difference...
              BBC Radio 3 listeners are down and Classic FM’s audience is its second lowest on record, according to new figures from RAJAR (Radio Join Audience Research). Released today, the figures cover the second quarter of 2024.

              Comment

              • cloughie
                Full Member
                • Dec 2011
                • 22128

                #82
                Originally posted by Serial_Apologist View Post
                For anyone interested, with reference to Lancashire coastal trees leaning inland in Ian Skelly's entry above, the common phenomenon of weather-shaped or stunted trees and shrubs along windswept coasts and hillsides is known as "wind pruning". ..
                As Freddie sang ‘Anyway the wind blows ….’

                Comment

                • LMcD
                  Full Member
                  • Sep 2017
                  • 8483

                  #83
                  Originally posted by oddoneout View Post

                  When you have so few listeners in the first place losing a few thousand makes a difference...
                  https://www.david-taylor.org/blog/cl...tening-figures
                  Radio 3 weekly listenership up 3.3% year-on-year to 1.995 million, and up 12.4% on the previous quarter. Average hours per listener up 11% to 8 hours. Might 'steady as she goes' be a fair comment while we await evidence of the consequences of young Jackson's 'refresh'?

                  Comment

                  • Pulcinella
                    Host
                    • Feb 2014
                    • 10952

                    #84
                    Originally posted by LMcD View Post

                    Radio 3 weekly listenership up 3.3% year-on-year to 1.995 million, and up 12.4% on the previous quarter. Average hours per listener up 11% to 8 hours. Might 'steady as she goes' be a fair comment?
                    Goes where, though?
                    Rapidly downhill, for many of us, I fear.

                    Comment

                    • LMcD
                      Full Member
                      • Sep 2017
                      • 8483

                      #85
                      Originally posted by Pulcinella View Post

                      Goes where, though?
                      Rapidly downhill, for many of us, I fear.
                      Perhaps our ship is being steered in the wrong direction and some of its passengers are very unhappy, but at least it's still afloat. Scala Radio can best be described as a leaking dinghy, while Classic FM seems to be losing power as the relentless fall in it listener numbers continues.
                      Last edited by LMcD; 27-05-24, 08:39.

                      Comment

                      • cloughie
                        Full Member
                        • Dec 2011
                        • 22128

                        #86
                        Originally posted by LMcD View Post

                        Radio 3 weekly listenership up 3.3% year-on-year to 1.995 million, and up 12.4% on the previous quarter. Average hours per listener up 11% to 8 hours. Might 'steady as she goes' be a fair comment while we await evidence of the consequences of young Jackson's 'refresh'?
                        Indeed, but of course maybe the CFM2 approach will attract more CFM listeners - following Lee Hazlewood’s lead ‘ I’m goin’ to Jackson ‘!

                        Comment

                        • antongould
                          Full Member
                          • Nov 2010
                          • 8790

                          #87
                          Originally posted by Pulcinella View Post

                          Goes where, though?
                          Rapidly downhill, for many of us, I fear.
                          Rapidly …. ????? ….. scarily I find I have been hereabouts since 2010 and the R3 of now is, IMVVHO, not much changed from then …….

                          Comment

                          • Pulcinella
                            Host
                            • Feb 2014
                            • 10952

                            #88
                            Originally posted by antongould View Post

                            Rapidly …. ????? ….. scarily I find I have been hereabouts since 2010 and the R3 of now is, IMVVHO, not much changed from then …….
                            You're probably right, but it seems that the rate of decline is increasing.
                            Shows how long I've not been listening for.
                            Gone are the days of my youth (in more ways than one!).

                            Comment

                            • LMcD
                              Full Member
                              • Sep 2017
                              • 8483

                              #89
                              Originally posted by antongould View Post

                              Rapidly …. ????? ….. scarily I find I have been hereabouts since 2010 and the R3 of now is, IMVVHO, not much changed from then …….
                              'Don't panic, Captain Jackson!.

                              Comment

                              • antongould
                                Full Member
                                • Nov 2010
                                • 8790

                                #90
                                Originally posted by LMcD View Post

                                'Don't panic, Captain Jackson!.
                                indeed when one supports the Hangers one is well versed in rapid decline

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X