As I feebly try to correct with the morning world I personally find the headlines "useful" and at 60 seconds on the hour and 30 seconds on the quarter I do not feel vast chunks of my life have been wasted!
So what's wrong with Radio 3 Breakfast?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by antongould View PostAs I feebly try to correct with the morning world I personally find the headlines "useful" and at 60 seconds on the hour and 30 seconds on the quarter I do not feel vast chunks of my life have been wasted!
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by mercia View Postcommon sense tells me that RW meant the requests had come over time, rather than all at once
anton: I appreciate that some people do indeed welcome regular repetition/updates on the news, especially if that's the kind of radio they've been used to. But for people who tune in to hear music, the interventions, including other comments, trails, time-checks &c, become the purpose of the programme - with the music fitted in round it. If you just want music (plus the occasional, on the hour, bulletin), such a 'breakfast show' isn't worth listening to and the BBC is no longer providing early morning music - just early morning breakfast shows, of varying kinds.It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Comment
-
-
Domeyhead
Originally posted by antongould View PostAs I feebly try to correct with the morning worIld I personally find the headlines "useful" and at 60 seconds on the hour and 30 seconds on the quarter I do not feel vast chunks of my life have been wasted!
I also find the whole concept of these soundbite "factoids" irritating - Chris Morris foresaw and satirised this pointless obsession with "news" in The Day today. What am I supposed to do with this tiny amount of information except stress over it? They are nothing more than editorially selected "fact commercials" . The whole concept of this immediate delivery of news is another BBC conceit that I can do without.
Comment
-
Don Petter
Very well said, Dh.
I resent being told what 'news' is important - it may well not be important or of interest to me. That is why I never watch news on TV, with its doom laden music and false gravitas, or listen to it on the radio. I much prefer to read a newspaper, where I can skip and select as it suits me. If I do need instant information I can look at the BBC site on line, and again be as selective as I wish.
Comment
-
Originally posted by french frank View PostIf you just want music (plus the occasional, on the hour, bulletin), such a 'breakfast show' isn't worth listening to and the BBC is no longer providing early morning music - just early morning breakfast shows, of varying kinds.
As an aside did anyone think this morning's 'Your call' was a stitch-up?
Comment
-
-
Domeyhead
Very droll Cloughie! Though it was a relief to hear someone requesting something that isn't played on every other day of the year anyway. When someone last week called in and requested the Dambusters March I nearly completed a double whammy by throwing the radio at the television.
Comment
-
Originally posted by cloughie View PostAs an aside did anyone think this morning's 'Your call' was a stitch-up?
No more than yesterday's was a home berth!
Comment
-
Comment