Originally posted by Master Jacques
View Post
Essential Classics - The Continuing Debate
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Master Jacques View PostOnly fools deride and/or ridicule Carmina Burana, which will long stand as one of the key choral works of the 20th c. Orff is a classic example of a great composer on whom some totally unwarranted mud has stuck. We needn't like his work, but we do need to respect it for doing something uniquely communicative in a very different manner from his contemporaries. His later operas, such as Die Bernauerin and Antigone, are astonishingly powerful: but Carmina Burana simply reaches parts of the soul which other pieces don't!
I first heard Carmina Burana in my early teens (part of it was played as the background music at the start of the school assembly one day, and it electrified a large proportion of us - and not just the ones who were specialising in music.) I still retain a great fondness for it (a long time ago, I played one of the piano parts in a performance of a version for soloists, chorus and two pianos only: that was an experience I won't forget.)
I don't know the two operas you mention - I'll look them up. I'm also fond of "Trionfo di Afrodite" (although it seems a bit rambly at times, there are some brilliantly exciting sections.)
One should also pay tribute to the Orff Schulwerk, which is still widely admired and used in music education and other contexts.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by peterthekeys View Post...
I don't know the two operas you mention - I'll look them up. I'm also fond of "Trionfo di Afrodite" (although it seems a bit rambly at times, there are some brilliantly exciting sections.)
...
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Serial_Apologist View PostHumm - I've always assocated the work with a reductionist masculinist "Rite of Spring" primitivism, appealing to the Nazis. Do you suppose then that they must have passed it for reasons of stupidity?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Pulcinella View PostI have that coupled with Catulli carmina in an HMV Classics release (Munich Radio SO/Welser-Möst); must dig it out and (re)listen as I have no memory of it whatsoever.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by peterthekeys View PostI guess that politicians will always use music to further their causes, and will pick the music which seems best to reflect those causes. But that's a very long way from paying or otherwise coercing a composer to turn out suitable music as required
Over the last few years, I've been listening to Symphony 4 a lot, and it's now up there with my favourites (that devastating ending, like the pronouncement and enactment of a death sentence!) I still wonder about how Shostakovich must have felt when he realised that he was going to have to bury that work, probably permanently.
Comment
-
-
Festive(?) Overture
Originally posted by peterthekeys View PostIn the case of Shostakovich, I find that even in his most apparently "socialist realism" works (e.g. the Festive Overture and symphony 12), the music is still fine enough to appeal outside of the political context. (And Shostakovich the court jester so often appears to be in the background - the fast sections of the Festive Overture are pure silent film music.)
For some reason I didn't get to hear it till some 15 years ago, on car radio - don't think it got out much in the west! My first reaction was 'This just has to be a total piss-take!" I'm rather confirmed in this view by seeing the background to its composition. Being famed for his speed of composition DSCH was asked by officialdom at the very last minute for a suitably rousing work (written apparently in three days flat!) for a Bolshoi concert celebrating the 1954 anniversary of the October Revolution, another composer having failed to deliver on time. What better excuse and opportunity to write a totally OTT and empty piece debunking the whole genre of communist celebratory 'classical' music?
Note that the composer had a long history of failing to provide such works, thereby incurring very serious displeasure from the very top (Stalin) - promised but never delivered Lenin choral symphonies, the 8th and 9th symphonies which failed signally to 'properly' celebrate Russia's victory over Germany, etc. To my mind there's also some confirmation of this reading in the abjectly crawling apology the composer wrote to the top dogs lamenting the total inadequacy of his response to the commission, and mentioning the mad rush (can't track it down to quote exactly). I suspect this was a double pleasure to write: completely fake sorrow in the best party language, yet a good insurance policy if anyone suggested that what he'd written was indeed a complete piss-take!
Also, so close after the death of Stalin it must have seemed a tiny bit safer to play such games, and perhaps the riotous celebration in the work really has much more to do with this 'sad' event than with 1917??Last edited by LeMartinPecheur; 10-06-19, 13:20.I keep hitting the Escape key, but I'm still here!
Comment
-
-
The end-of-Breakfast trailer indicated that the programme was to feature the brass band tradition in the north of England - something of great to me, even though I’m not a brass player. Then SK’s patronising voice came over the airwaves as a punishment. Do I try to listen? A very fraught choice.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View PostThe end-of-Breakfast trailer indicated that the programme was to feature the brass band tradition in the north of England - something of great to me, even though I’m not a brass player. Then SK’s patronising voice came over the airwaves as a punishment. Do I try to listen? A very fraught choice.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View PostThere was some reference to it in the chit-chat, but the trailer was misleading.
Comment
-
Comment