This morning Sarah Walker introduced the Glazunov A minor Violin Concerto as being ‘in three continuous movements’.
I knew what she meant but it didn’t seem to sound quite right. Would it have been better as ‘one continuous movement’ (perhaps ‘in the usual three sections’)? Maybe pedantically ‘three contiguous movements’.
All in all, I think the natural description would have been ‘in three movements, played without a break’.
I knew what she meant but it didn’t seem to sound quite right. Would it have been better as ‘one continuous movement’ (perhaps ‘in the usual three sections’)? Maybe pedantically ‘three contiguous movements’.
All in all, I think the natural description would have been ‘in three movements, played without a break’.
Comment