Originally posted by Pulcinella
View Post
Essential Classics - The Continuing Debate
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by cloughie View PostCurrently tuned in to Essential Classics - Suzi is blessed with a clear speaking voice but it is a shame she doesn’t use it, instead she insists on mumbling on air and lowering her voice at the end of sentences. Georgia could give her lessons!
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by LMcD View Post... or perhaps she'll have learnt something from working with Lennie Henry?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Bryn View PostWho, in turn, could learn that a sonata for piano and violin is not a symphony (his interview on BBC 1 this morning where he went on about the origin of the Kreutzer Symphony[sic]. Congratulations to him for taking up the piano in his dotage, though (grade 4, heading for grade 5). Good description and promotion of Joplin's Treemonisha, too.
'La Traviata is the by this composer, whose English name 's Joe Green' (V)
WG's answer: 'Vivaldi'
LH is more likely to enthuse people than lecture them - if nothing else, he and SK could make an entertaining 'odd couple'.Last edited by LMcD; 23-09-20, 08:39.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by cloughie View PostCurrently tuned in to Essential Classics - Suzi is blessed with a clear speaking voice but it is a shame she doesn’t use it, instead she insists on mumbling on air and lowering her voice at the end of sentences. Georgia could give her lessons!
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by LMcD View PostMore forgivable than Will Gompertz's gaffe on 'Pointless':
'La Traviata is the by this composer, whose English name 's Joe Green' (V)
WG's answer: 'Vivaldi'
LH is more likely to enthuse people than lecture them - if nothing else, he and SK could make an entertaining 'odd couple'.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by alycidon View PostAfter this morning’s offerings it should be renamed Essential Jazz! Don’t get me wrong, I quite enjoy jazz but not when it is mixed in with the classics. Just saying!
I think that mixing in jazz is a good thing so long as not done to excess, and the morning schedule programmes are a good place to do it. There is after all a longstanding interest on the part of both 'classical' and jazz musicians in each others music, which I assume is the purpose of Bryn's post. As an uninformed music listener I am hard put to differentiate between the contemporary jazz I occasionally hear on R3 and the contemporary 'classical' music ditto, particularly where improvisation is involved, in terms of why they fall into different camps. The boundaries seem to me to be pretty fluid in many cases.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by alycidon View PostAfter this morning’s offerings it should be renamed Essential Jazz! Don’t get me wrong, I quite enjoy jazz but not when it is mixed in with the classics. Just saying!
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by oddoneout View PostAfraid I will have to disagree somewhat with you there, and also ask why you take that view? Do you find that the juxtaposition jars?
I think that mixing in jazz is a good thing so long as not done to excess, and the morning schedule programmes are a good place to do it. There is after all a longstanding interest on the part of both 'classical' and jazz musicians in each others music, which I assume is the purpose of Bryn's post. As an uninformed music listener I am hard put to differentiate between the contemporary jazz I occasionally hear on R3 and the contemporary 'classical' music ditto, particularly where improvisation is involved, in terms of why they fall into different camps. The boundaries seem to me to be pretty fluid in many cases.
Comment
-
Comment