Essential Classics - The Continuing Debate
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by MrGongGong View PostSurely EVERYONE on the Radio, TV, Introducing concerts etc etc is "acting" in some way?
It's not so much SK's (or IS's) tone of voice that puts me off listening to EC - in fact, I find her far less "schoolmarmish" than I remember Patricia Hughes sounding in the 1970s (and hers was the voice of a schoolmarm who sounded as if she expected to find you up to no good) - it's the choice and general attitude to the Music that gets broadcast that keeps me away.
Though Ms Hughes had her fans, of course - so "schoolmarmite"?[FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
Comment
-
-
Richard Tarleton
Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View Postin fact, I find her far less "schoolmarmish" than I remember Patricia Hughes sounding in the 1970s (and hers was the voice of a schoolmarm who sounded as if she expected to find you up to no good)Though Ms Hughes had her fans, of course - so "schoolmarmite"?
Comment
-
Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View PostYes - it's a bit like the "telephone voice" that some people used to adopt when telephones were less ubiquitous.
It's not so much SK's (or IS's) tone of voice that puts me off listening to EC - in fact, I find her far less "schoolmarmish" than I remember Patricia Hughes sounding in the 1970s (and hers was the voice of a schoolmarm who sounded as if she expected to find you up to no good) - it's the choice and general attitude to the Music that gets broadcast that keeps me away.
Though Ms Hughes had her fans, of course - so "schoolmarmite"?
Comment
-
-
Richard Tarleton
Originally posted by LMcD View PostIIRC Patricia Hughes was Radio 3 duty announcer (or 'presenter' if you prefer) on the day of the memorial service commemorating the victims of the 1972 Olympics terrorist attack in Munich. I believe the piece chosen to accompany the occasion was the slow movement from the 'Eroica'. She may have given the impression that she was conducting a tutorial in her room at a distinguished university, but I don't think she lectured or hectored her listeners.
Comment
-
Originally posted by LMcD View PostIIRC Patricia Hughes was Radio 3 duty announcer (or 'presenter' if you prefer) on the day of the memorial service commemorating the victims of the 1972 Olympics terrorist attack in Munich. I believe the piece chosen to accompany the occasion was the slow movement from the 'Eroica'. She may have given the impression that she was conducting a tutorial in her room at a distinguished university, but I don't think she lectured or hectored her listeners.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by MrGongGong View PostSurely EVERYONE on the Radio, TV, Introducing concerts etc etc is "acting" in some way?
Some folks (Tony Pappano, for example) are very "close" to what they are "in the flesh"
but all presenting involves changing how one is to communicate to others in a way that the audience will grasp.
There really is no "natural" at all IMVIt isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by french frank View PostI don’t remember P Hughes - though surely she belonged to a different era of presenting anyway?[FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Barbirollians View PostYes Skelly's style on this programme seems to be " I can't believe you are listening to this nonsense " so I will talk to you as if you are as dim as dim .
I would suppose the snippets of background information he introduces pieces with have you all shouting " Oh come on .... " but are you are not, I would suggest, a typical audience.
To me he thrives on the interaction with the audience, which given where we are in the evolution of social media, is IMMVHO, unlikely to go away and uses it to add insight on the music being played.
It was interesting that when the "What would you follow this with ... " feature started it was universally hailed as a fix ..... the obvious piece would always be played. Is that still the view ... ??? or has bbm by his sterling efforts brought a change of mind ... ????
OK I know you couldn't care less .....
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by antongould View PostI wouldn't agree - he does not come over that way to me at all, which I guess, proves I am " ... as dim as dim ... " ..... He certainly doesn't talk as if his sole audience are the, very knowledgeable, people hereabouts.
The R3 morning team seem only to address the preliminary grade listeners, with the result that they never develop.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Eine Alpensinfonie View PostThat's where the like of Antony Hopkins were so successful. They could speak to those with limited musical knowledge or experience, but they could also speak to those with greater knowledge and experience.
The R3 morning team seem only to address the preliminary grade listeners, with the result that they never develop.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by antongould View PostWell I, obviously talking from the feeble side of the spectrum, feel Skellers has the same ability, although to what extent, can be debated. He often goes in technical areas and IIRC has won praise from Tony on this thread. I also like that he seems quite happy to disagree with tweeters on the merits of a piece or performance and explain why ......
Personally , I miss Rob Cowan , and his specific expertise, as well as his genial somewhat “man of the people” ( well as it goes in this kind of music) style.
( I’m sure that your part of the spectrum , as you call it, is a fine place to be......)I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.
I am not a number, I am a free man.
Comment
-
Comment