Essential Classics - The Continuing Debate

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • vinteuil
    Full Member
    • Nov 2010
    • 12783

    .

    ... well, we shall have to disagree. I find certain kinds of arrogance amusing, even beguiling; I appreciate the dandy.

    I find unsought-for chumminess "universally unattractive"...

    .

    Comment

    • gurnemanz
      Full Member
      • Nov 2010
      • 7380

      As with sports commentary, trying too hard - arrogance or chumminess -is usually an intrusion, in that they are drawing attention to themselves rather than illuminating the sport/music. Cliché, but less is more.

      Comment

      • Stanfordian
        Full Member
        • Dec 2010
        • 9308

        Originally posted by vinteuil View Post
        .

        ... well, we shall have to disagree. I find certain kinds of arrogance amusing, even beguiling; I appreciate the dandy.

        I find unsought-for chumminess "universally unattractive"...

        .
        Hiya vinteuil,

        You mention chumminess. Yeah, presenters wanting to be your mate!
        Last edited by Stanfordian; 20-12-17, 12:45.

        Comment

        • vinteuil
          Full Member
          • Nov 2010
          • 12783

          Originally posted by Stanfordian View Post
          Hiya vinteuil,

          Yea, presenters wanting to be your mate!

          Comment

          • ferneyhoughgeliebte
            Gone fishin'
            • Sep 2011
            • 30163

            Originally posted by gurnemanz View Post
            As with sports commentary, trying too hard - arrogance or chumminess -is usually an intrusion, in that they are drawing attention to themselves rather than illuminating the sport/music. Cliché, but less is more.


            "Arrogance" and "chumminess" aren't mutually exclusive - Patricia Hughes in days of yore always managed to sound "chummy" to those of her "circle" and made it seem abundantly clear to me that I wasn't welcome to join it.

            SK's manner is different - it reminds me of nothing other than quite a few Supply Teachers I encountered in my working life (and, indeed, as a schoolkid): they'd done quite a bit of work preparing a lesson that they were convinced the kids would really like, and when said kids found it less than whelming, those teachers would react with defensive and petulant passive aggression - it was the pesky kids' fault, not their own.

            Fellow enthusiasts of Terry Pratchett's oeuvre will perhaps also be reminded of aspects of Annagramma from the wonderful Tiffany Aching novels.

            [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

            Comment

            • french frank
              Administrator/Moderator
              • Feb 2007
              • 30241

              Originally posted by vinteuil View Post
              ... well, we shall have to disagree. I find certain kinds of arrogance amusing, even beguiling; I appreciate the dandy.

              I find unsought-for chumminess "universally unattractive"....
              We are of fundamentally different natures, so I think it's more a question of 'feeling the same' or 'feeling the opposite.

              The problem with 'chumminess' is that, again, it depends how one individual responds to another individual. You might respond positively to an arrogantly amusing dandy - whose 'chumminess' would be of a different style (and certainly be called something different) - inviting you to join his [sic] exclusive club where you would enjoy his [sic] company.
              It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

              Comment

              • Sir Velo
                Full Member
                • Oct 2012
                • 3225

                Originally posted by french frank View Post
                inviting you to join his [sic] exclusive club where you would enjoy his [sic] company.
                Definitely sick (sic) making...

                Comment

                • LMcD
                  Full Member
                  • Sep 2017
                  • 8405

                  Originally posted by vinteuil View Post
                  If she can't pronounce the names of English castles correctly, it's hardly surprising that she struggles with other languages. She should take a lesson from Alexander Armstrong on 'Pointless', who effortlessly deals with French, German, Italian and, as far as I can tell, more exotic languages. (Come to think of it, he'd make a better job of 'EC').
                  I suppose the question is: Should a Radio 3 announcer (or any other BBC announcer) be expected to pronounce foreign languages correctly, or at least seek advice if in doubt or difficulty?
                  I would have thought it was a Sinny Kwar Nun.

                  Comment

                  • french frank
                    Administrator/Moderator
                    • Feb 2007
                    • 30241

                    Originally posted by LMcD View Post
                    I would have thought it was a Sinny Kwar Nun.
                    Or Synee Kway Nohn.

                    Not much point in the BBC having a Pronunciation Unit if it's not consulted by on-air staff. The problem presenters are those who 'think they know' or can 'make a jolly good guess'. Though the producer has a duty to ensure that, preferably, mistakes aren't made; but that if they are, they're quickly corrected.
                    It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

                    Comment

                    • Eine Alpensinfonie
                      Host
                      • Nov 2010
                      • 20570

                      Originally posted by oddoneout View Post
                      The Time Traveller slot was to do with Christmas gifts in 1817, and mentioned pictures of Belvoir Castle, pronounced 'Bellvwahr'(ie french style). I had always understood it to be 'Beever', or is that only as in Vale of....?
                      "The castle's name means beautiful view. The name Belvoir is, in fact, a Norman import by the French-speaking invaders, but the native Anglo-Saxon population was unable to pronounce such a foreign word, preferring to call it "Beaver Castle" – a usage which persists today."

                      Comment

                      • underthecountertenor
                        Full Member
                        • Apr 2011
                        • 1584

                        Originally posted by LMcD View Post
                        If she can't pronounce the names of English castles correctly, it's hardly surprising that she struggles with other languages. She should take a lesson from Alexander Armstrong on 'Pointless', who effortlessly deals with French, German, Italian and, as far as I can tell, more exotic languages. (Come to think of it, he'd make a better job of 'EC').
                        I suppose the question is: Should a Radio 3 announcer (or any other BBC announcer) be expected to pronounce foreign languages correctly, or at least seek advice if in doubt or difficulty?
                        I would have thought it was a Sinny Kwar Nun.
                        It was not Suzy Klein, but a Dr Alun Withey (BBC New Generation Thinker, god help us) who perpetrated this.

                        As to Alexander Armstrong - well, anything to keep him out of mischief (i.e. recording albums) I suppose.

                        Comment

                        • vinteuil
                          Full Member
                          • Nov 2010
                          • 12783

                          Originally posted by french frank View Post

                          The problem with 'chumminess' is that, again, it depends how one individual responds to another individual. You might respond positively to an arrogantly amusing dandy - whose 'chumminess' would be of a different style (and certainly be called something different) - inviting you to join his [sic] exclusive club where you would enjoy his [sic] company.
                          ... no : I think the 'problem' with chumminess is that it is fake, a spurious assumption of friendly intimacy that has not been earned and is not desired. If I am amused by a certain dandiacal arrogance it is not at all that I wish to be 'friends' with such a person: 'chumminess' does not enter the equation.

                          .

                          Comment

                          • BBMmk2
                            Late Member
                            • Nov 2010
                            • 20908

                            Originally posted by vinteuil View Post
                            ... no : I think the 'problem' with chumminess is that it is fake, a spurious assumption of friendly intimacy that has not been earned and is not desired. If I am amused by a certain dandiacal arrogance it is not at all that I wish to be 'friends' with such a person: 'chumminess' does not enter the equation.

                            .
                            Just need presenters to be themselves/
                            Don’t cry for me
                            I go where music was born

                            J S Bach 1685-1750

                            Comment

                            • ferneyhoughgeliebte
                              Gone fishin'
                              • Sep 2011
                              • 30163

                              Originally posted by Brassbandmaestro View Post
                              Just need presenters to be themselves/
                              I think that some of them are "being themselves" - that's the problem.
                              [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

                              Comment

                              • Eine Alpensinfonie
                                Host
                                • Nov 2010
                                • 20570

                                Originally posted by vinteuil View Post
                                ... no : I think the 'problem' with chumminess is that it is fake, a spurious assumption of friendly intimacy that has not been earned and is not desired. If I am amused by a certain dandiacal arrogance it is not at all that I wish to be 'friends' with such a person: 'chumminess' does not enter the equation.

                                .
                                Of course it's fake.

                                "Thank you for your company."

                                Er... no. I'm hundreds of miles away; you don't know me from Adam, and the only company you have at at the moment is a technician and possibly the presenter of the next programme.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X