Gillian Reynolds - Feedback and "witless wittering"

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • rank_and_file
    • Nov 2024

    Gillian Reynolds - Feedback and "witless wittering"

    For those of you who have not seen it, here is the link to Gillian Reynolds' coverage of the forthcoming Feedback programme:

  • Chris Newman
    Late Member
    • Nov 2010
    • 2100

    #2
    The thought of retching into the future springs to mind

    Comment

    • french frank
      Administrator/Moderator
      • Feb 2007
      • 30283

      #3
      "Being realistic and thinking back to when such changes were last attempted, expect no recant for at least a year. " (Gillian Reynolds)

      Yes, RW a tougher nut to crack than the civilised Stephen Hearst: he only managed 7 months before his phone-ins were dropped. Paul Donovan in the S Times also looks ahead to Feedback when the controller will appear "to answer (that is, probably, brush aside) listeners' complaints about his new autumn schedule and, in particular, the changes in the Breakfast show: banal phone-ins, snippety music, DJ prattle, endless urging to text and tweet".

      Not clear whether those last bits were PD's opinion or the listeners'. But this is PD's: "Your Call is banal, tedious, diminishes the power of what is usually exquisite music and is best avoided."

      I think/hope a Guardian opinion blog will have 600 words tomorrow or Thursday to add to the chorus of disapproval.
      It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

      Comment

      • amateur51

        #4
        Originally posted by french frank View Post
        I think/hope a Guardian opinion blog will have 600 words tomorrow or Thursday to add to the chorus of disapproval.
        Let's hope it's by Nancy Banks-Smith and that she's been at the cooking vodka again
        Last edited by Guest; 04-10-11, 17:58. Reason: Judicious trimming of the original

        Comment

        • DracoM
          Host
          • Mar 2007
          • 12970

          #5
          Doesn't pull her punches, our Gillian. How central is the Telegraph to the R3 demographic?

          Comment

          • french frank
            Administrator/Moderator
            • Feb 2007
            • 30283

            #6
            Originally posted by amateur51 View Post
            Let's hope it's by Nancy Banks-Smith and that she's been at the cooking vodka again
            No, I'm afraid not

            A ploddingly argued piece not unlike my own style
            How central is the Telegraph to the R3 demographic?
            Fairly, I think.

            Our problem has been getting the Guardian to take up the issues at all. Tom Service was obviously not going to do a Michael White on his own employer, and the radio critic seems to be Nu3's target audience.
            It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

            Comment

            • rank_and_file

              #7
              DracoM

              She's the doyenne of Radio Critics and, I think, very pro BBC, and loves Radio 4. They let her do the continuity/programme intros on Radio 4 a few years ago, so I presume they think she is "on side". She is well into retiring age. See Wikipedia:

              Comment

              • Andrew Slater
                Full Member
                • Mar 2007
                • 1792

                #8
                Originally posted by french frank View Post
                No, I'm afraid not

                A ploddingly argued piece not unlike my own style
                It seems to be here.

                Comment

                • french frank
                  Administrator/Moderator
                  • Feb 2007
                  • 30283

                  #9
                  Yup, that's it. I'm supposed to defend it against the Guardian blog readership - hope you don't leave me on my own!
                  It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

                  Comment

                  • rank_and_file

                    #10
                    FF

                    Well argued article in the Guardian - the message IS spreading!

                    Comment

                    • doversoul1
                      Ex Member
                      • Dec 2010
                      • 7132

                      #11
                      ff


                      Can you not post the link somewhere more unmissable so that some of our brave souls may join the battle?

                      Comment

                      • french frank
                        Administrator/Moderator
                        • Feb 2007
                        • 30283

                        #12
                        Originally posted by doversoul View Post
                        ff


                        Can you not post the link somewhere more unmissable so that some of our brave souls may join the battle?
                        I'm not sure where is more unmissable . But here it is. Looks like the opposition is warming up. [Loved the witticism of 'with Friends like these who needs enemies' - I wonder if it's someone I know!]
                        It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

                        Comment

                        • DracoM
                          Host
                          • Mar 2007
                          • 12970

                          #13
                          Fine article.

                          In what way can we effectively lobby The Guardian in supporting you?

                          Comment

                          • french frank
                            Administrator/Moderator
                            • Feb 2007
                            • 30283

                            #14
                            Originally posted by DracoM View Post
                            Fine article.

                            In what way can we effectively lobby The Guardian in supporting you?
                            Just register and write your comments underneath .

                            If it hadn't been for that dissenter claiming that the changes were 'minimal' I wouldn't have got into the whole business of 'what's wrong with Radio 3' and would have stuck to the 'let's have a reasoned explanation with responses to the questions'.

                            How do they think that the new schedules (that is, the new programmes and styles) are being greeted by the average R3 listener, age 59, seriously interested in music (of whatever kind)? Where will the knowledgeable listeners of the future be found/educated? What is the justification for setting up a second station aimed and people with a casual interest in classical music? And so on ...



                            The Facebook thing now seems to have been invaded à la Arab spring by happy-clappy teens going "Wow, ah just luv u!"
                            It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

                            Comment

                            • Petekelly55

                              #15
                              Don't know if this link has been posted already. Here is 'conservative' blog site Dale & Co's take on R3 - http://www.iaindale.com/posts/nightmare-on-elgar-street.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X