I switched to radio 3 this morning around 8.15am to be greeted by an awful sound. Route marching in squelchy wellingtons on scratchy vinyl? Is this extreme modernism? The DJ didn't bother telling us,... alluded to "everyday sounds". Imagine spending everyday with squelchy wellingtons . No excuse for playing this once, never mind several times between tracks. Why are radio 3 torturing us?... Then another boring choral piece, then my active speaker crashed (hurrah!)
Awful, between tracks, sound torture & boredom
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Mal View PostI switched to radio 3 this morning around 8.15am to be greeted by an awful sound. Route marching in squelchy wellingtons on scratchy vinyl? Is this extreme modernism? The DJ didn't bother telling us,... alluded to "everyday sounds". Imagine spending everyday with squelchy wellingtons . No excuse for playing this once, never mind several times between tracks. Why are radio 3 torturing us?... Then another boring choral piece, then my active speaker crashed (hurrah!)
-
-
Originally posted by Mal View PostI switched to radio 3 this morning around 8.15am to be greeted by an awful sound. Route marching in squelchy wellingtons on scratchy vinyl? Is this extreme modernism? The DJ didn't bother telling us,... alluded to "everyday sounds". Imagine spending everyday with squelchy wellingtons . No excuse for playing this once, never mind several times between tracks. Why are radio 3 torturing us?... Then another boring choral piece, then my active speaker crashed (hurrah!)
Comment
-
-
Ah: https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p03xx3t7
As to the specific 8:15 sounds, there's no business like snow business.
Comment
-
-
A comment from my partner, who's the one who usually uses the car to get to some meetings, albeit often at the same time of day (before 9).
Fairly random survey, but more often than not, if he switches R3 on he hears chat (and switches to CFM), whereas CFM is more usually at least playing music.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by cat View PostIt was described as the "Saturday Sound", presumably a regular thing. On this occasion it was a recording made by a listener of them walking through snow in Tromso.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Pulcinella View PostA comment from my partner, who's the one who usually uses the car to get to some meetings, albeit often at the same time of day (before 9).
Fairly random survey, but more often than not, if he switches R3 on he hears chat (and switches to CFM), whereas CFM is more usually at least playing music.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Mal View PostI switched to radio 3 this morning around 8.15am to be greeted by an awful sound. Route marching in squelchy wellingtons on scratchy vinyl? Is this extreme modernism? The DJ didn't bother telling us,... alluded to "everyday sounds". Imagine spending everyday with squelchy wellingtons . No excuse for playing this once, never mind several times between tracks. Why are radio 3 torturing us?... Then another boring choral piece, then my active speaker crashed (hurrah!)
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Bryn View PostAnd with its severe dynamic compression, 'Car Sick' FM is best suited to in-car listening.
But I really don't object too much when travelling, that's true, as even music from my iPod can be pretty inaudible unless it's chunky baroque-type stuff (Brandenburgs, for example).
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Cockney Sparrow View PostSame happens on Sunday. I'm happy to listen to Martin Handley - as part of a relaxed start to Sunday morning, but I turn it off for about 10 minutes when they start these sound segments - its gone too far for me.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by oddoneout View PostI liked the bells recordings on Sunday mornings. They conjured up pleasant memories or mental pictures, and the music chosen to follow on was often interesting. The wider subject listener contribution was OK for a limited number of outings or as an occasional offering but expanding it outside the original slot and keeping it going long past its even vaguely useful life has been a big mistake.
Comment
-
-
I'm with Cage on such sounds:
This summer I’m going to give a class in mushroom
identification at the New School for Social Research.
Actually, it’s five field trips, not really a class
at all. However, when I proposed it to Dean Clara
Mayer, though she was delighted with the idea, she
said, “I’ll have to let you know later whether or not
we’ll give it.” So she spoke to the president who
couldn’t see why there should be a class in mushrooms
at the New School. Next she spoke to Professor MacIvor
who lives in Piermont. She said, “What do you think
about our having a mushroom class at the New School?”
He said, “Fine idea. Nothing more than mushroom
identification develops the powers of observation.”
This remark was relayed both to the president and to
me. It served to get the class into the catalogue and
to verbalize for me my present attitude towards
music: it isn’t useful, music isn’t, unless it
develops our powers of audition. But most musicians
can’t hear a single sound, they listen only to the
relationship between two or more sounds. Music for
them has nothing to do with their powers of audition,
but only to do with their powers of observing
relationships. In order to do this, they have to
ignore all the crying babies, fire engines, telephone
bells, coughs, that happen to occur during their
auditions. Actually, if you run into people who are
really interested in hearing sounds, you’re apt to
find them fascinated by the quiet ones. “Did you hear
that?” they will say.
Comment
-
Comment