Originally posted by arancie33
View Post
Excuse me but do you mean….?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by arancie33 View PostI think it a bit rich that the writer of the opening message can’t get the name of the presenter he’s criticising correct. It’s
“Kate Molleson” not “Morrison”.
Check jayne lee wilson’s post - opening quotation - for further comment and advice.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Bryn View PostOh, come on. I'm an atheist and even I know Moses lived way before Mary gave birth to Jesus, let alone before he gave rise to a revised version of Judaism.It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by LMcD View PostA BBC reporter yesterday informed us that one of the Top 5 Greatest Radio Programmes in the recent Radio Times poll was 'Around The Horne', a programme which might perhaps also appeal to fans of 'Around Britain Quiz'.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Bryn View PostI blame Grammarly. It hates "round" being used in place of "around".Last edited by ahinton; 14-02-19, 12:32.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by doversoul1 View PostThank you for pointing this out. Duly corrected.
Yes, we should be careful to ensure that details of our citations are correct and accurate, but to equate gaffs on the Forum (whose Hosts and contributors are unpaid enthusiasts) with those from a national public service broadcaster (with professional staff paid for from public funding) seems a little over-delicate to me.
And I don't think that using vocabulary such as "hypocrite" about other Forumistas is either helpful or in the best spirit of the Forum. Some temptations need to be more vigorously resisted.[FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View PostA dignified and polite response, dovers, thank you.
Yes, we should be careful to ensure that details of our citations are correct and accurate, but to equate gaffs on the Forum (whose Hosts and contributors are unpaid enthusiasts) with those from a national public service broadcaster (with professional staff paid for from public funding) seems a little over-delicate to me.
And I don't think that using vocabulary such as "hypocrite" about other Forumistas is either helpful or in the best spirit of the Forum. Some temptations need to be more vigorously resisted.
Another source of such gaffes is Radio Times, in each edition of which at least one error in the R3 listings can usually be found.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View PostA dignified and polite response, dovers, thank you.
Yes, we should be careful to ensure that details of our citations are correct and accurate, but to equate gaffs on the Forum (whose Hosts and contributors are unpaid enthusiasts) with those from a national public service broadcaster (with professional staff paid for from public funding) seems a little over-delicate to me.
And I don't think that using vocabulary such as "hypocrite" about other Forumistas is either helpful or in the best spirit of the Forum. Some temptations need to be more vigorously resisted.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by ahinton View PostConversely, I wonder what Sorabji - who was out of UK for an extended period when his first volume of essays was very poorly proof-read and published in his absence - would have made of it had those proof-reading shortcomings led to its being entitled A Round Music instead of Around Music?...
Comment
-
Comment