Bach Immersion

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • LMcD
    Full Member
    • Sep 2017
    • 8470

    #46
    Originally posted by oddoneout View Post
    And what do we get? Oklahoma. I don't have problem with it being broadcast on R3, and we had a lot of Bach yesterday, but Christmas Day evening concert....FCOL was that really the best they could do?
    It could be said that 'Oklahoma' accurately reflects the state that Radio 3 has gotten into (the Americanism is intentional)

    Comment

    • Bryn
      Banned
      • Mar 2007
      • 24688

      #47
      Originally posted by LMcD View Post
      It could be said that 'Oklahoma' accurately reflects the state that Radio 3 has gotten into (the Americanism is intentional)
      By Americanism, I take it you intend redundant British English (some would say correct British English).

      Comment

      • LMcD
        Full Member
        • Sep 2017
        • 8470

        #48
        Originally posted by Bryn View Post
        By Americanism, I take it you intend redundant British English (some would say correct British English).
        Every day I learn something, Mr. Fawlty!

        Comment

        • french frank
          Administrator/Moderator
          • Feb 2007
          • 30288

          #49
          Originally posted by Bryn View Post
          By Americanism, I take it you intend redundant British English (some would say correct British English).
          Others would say obsolete British English.
          It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

          Comment

          • Bryn
            Banned
            • Mar 2007
            • 24688

            #50
            Originally posted by french frank View Post
            Others would say obsolete British English.
            An interesting difference. However, since the sense implied is still of use, "obsolete" seems inapposite. "Redundant" is, I feel, more appropriate.

            "Redundant" means someone or something else is already doing the work; "obsolete" means the job no longer needs to be done. A redundant function can best be illustrated by a convenience store with five people on a shift; only one or two are actually needed to make the store perform profitably. Anybody else is redundant and should probably be fired. An obsolete function is one that is simply no longer needed in any context, like a blacksmith or someone who delivers huge blocks of ice. We shifted away from a horse-and-icebox-based economy about a century ago and are not going back. It isn't so much a matter of having too many blacksmith shops in town, it's more a matter of not needing any of them.

            Comment

            • french frank
              Administrator/Moderator
              • Feb 2007
              • 30288

              #51
              Originally posted by Bryn View Post
              An interesting difference. However, since the sense implied is still of use, "obsolete" seems inapposite. "Redundant" is, I feel, more appropriate.

              https://socratic.org/questions/what-...-and-redundant
              You may use that 'authority' (which even with the examples given seems, I feel, quite off the point).

              OED obsolete : No longer used or practised; outmoded, out of date ; Latin obsolētus grown old, worn out, dilapidated, fallen into disregard

              I can see nothing in the meaning provided for 'redundant' (nor in the OED's definitions) which would fit this case of language usage. The 'interesting' point is that when English was carried over to America by the early settlers 'gotten' was standard English. Whereas it is still current in transatlantic English, it lingers on merely in remote pockets of habitation in England, here and there with individual users .

              If one were to say 'obsolete and redundant', 'redundant' would be redundant because it adds nothing meaningful to the world 'obsolete'; if one were to say 'redundant and obsolete', 'obsolete' would not be redundant because it's necessary in order to explain what the heck you might mean by 'redundant'.
              It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

              Comment

              • vinteuil
                Full Member
                • Nov 2010
                • 12831

                #52
                .

                ... but it could be 'redundant' in the Miltonic* sense of 'abounding to excess, copious overflowing' - the additional letters at the the end of 'got ten' are redundant.

                *
                "... to visitants a gaze,
                Or pitied object, these redundant locks
                Robustious to no purpose clustring down,
                Vain monument of strength...
                "

                Samson Agonistes

                " ... his head
                Crested aloft, and carbuncle his eyes;
                With burnished neck of verdant gold, erect
                Amidst his circling spires, that on the grass
                Floated redundant: pleasing was his shape
                And lovely; never since of serpent-kind
                Lovelier. .
                .. "

                Paradise Lost




                .
                Last edited by vinteuil; 27-12-17, 10:20.

                Comment

                • jean
                  Late member
                  • Nov 2010
                  • 7100

                  #53
                  Redundancy as it's undertood in linguistics implies reinforcement rather than puyrposelessness.

                  Anyway, what about forgotten/forgot?

                  Comment

                  • vinteuil
                    Full Member
                    • Nov 2010
                    • 12831

                    #54
                    Originally posted by jean View Post

                    Anyway, what about forgotten/forgot?
                    ... as in that moment fraught with disaster in Act V scene iii of King Lear -

                    Albany - Great thing of us forgot! ...



                    .

                    Comment

                    • ferneyhoughgeliebte
                      Gone fishin'
                      • Sep 2011
                      • 30163

                      #55
                      Originally posted by vinteuil View Post
                      ... as in that moment fraught with disaster in Act V scene iii of King Lear -

                      Albany - Great thing of us forgot! ...
                      And Hamlet's hobby horse.
                      [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

                      Comment

                      • vinteuil
                        Full Member
                        • Nov 2010
                        • 12831

                        #56
                        Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View Post
                        And Hamlet's hobby horse.
                        ... where we have both forms in the same paragraph -

                        "So long? Nay then, let the devil wear black, for I’ll have a suit of sables. O heavens! Die two months ago and not forgotten yet? Then there’s hope a great man’s memory may outlive his life half a year. But, by 'r Lady, he must build churches then, or else shall he suffer not thinking on, with the hobby-horse, whose epitaph is “For, oh, for, oh, the hobby-horse is forgot.” "






                        .
                        Last edited by vinteuil; 27-12-17, 14:40.

                        Comment

                        • jean
                          Late member
                          • Nov 2010
                          • 7100

                          #57
                          And more augustly even, from Aubrey's Brief Lives:

                          This Earle of Oxford, making of his low obeisance to Queen Elizabeth, happened to let a Fart, at which he was so abashed and ashamed that he went to Travell, 7 yeares. On his returne the Queen welcomed him home, and sayd, My Lord, I had forgott the Fart.

                          Comment

                          • jean
                            Late member
                            • Nov 2010
                            • 7100

                            #58
                            Originally posted by vinteuil View Post
                            '...the hobby-horse, whose epitaph is “For, oh, for, oh, the hobby-horse is forgot.” '...

                            Comment

                            Working...
                            X