Music backwards?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Flay
    Full Member
    • Mar 2007
    • 5795

    #31
    I didn't know you spoke Shlew, ferney. Anna (yes, I spelt that backwards) would have been proud.

    Whatever did happen to Anna?
    Pacta sunt servanda !!!

    Comment

    • Dave2002
      Full Member
      • Dec 2010
      • 18025

      #32
      I think there's a typo in msg 31!

      Comment

      • french frank
        Administrator/Moderator
        • Feb 2007
        • 30329

        #33
        Originally posted by Dave2002 View Post
        I think there's a typo in msg 31!
        Yep, Flay meant Hslew. Or perhaps hsleW.
        It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

        Comment

        • ferneyhoughgeliebte
          Gone fishin'
          • Sep 2011
          • 30163

          #34
          That's the effect of htearhi for you!
          [FONT=Comic Sans MS][I][B]Numquam Satis![/B][/I][/FONT]

          Comment

          • MrGongGong
            Full Member
            • Nov 2010
            • 18357

            #35
            The whole thing is (of course) a dastardly plot by the Serialist Tendency to prove the Serialism wasn't the "dead end" in music history so often touted amongst some in the "Classical Music Fraternity"

            Comment

            • Dave2002
              Full Member
              • Dec 2010
              • 18025

              #36
              Originally posted by ferneyhoughgeliebte View Post
              That's the effect of htearhi for you!
              I guess that's hiraeth - with no translation to Hsilgne!

              Comment

              • ahinton
                Full Member
                • Nov 2010
                • 16123

                #37
                Originally posted by MrGongGong View Post
                The whole thing is (of course) a dastardly plot by the Serialist Tendency to prove the Serialism wasn't the "dead end" in music history so often touted amongst some in the "Classical Music Fraternity"
                Maybe, but shouldn't we all wait for S_A's authentic and definitive take on that before assuming certainty about it?

                Comment

                • Flay
                  Full Member
                  • Mar 2007
                  • 5795

                  #38
                  Originally posted by french frank View Post
                  Yep, Flay meant Hslew. Or perhaps hsleW.
                  Ho tish!
                  Pacta sunt servanda !!!

                  Comment

                  • Dave2002
                    Full Member
                    • Dec 2010
                    • 18025

                    #39
                    Originally posted by Flay View Post
                    Ho tish!
                    Won wno!

                    Comment

                    • ahinton
                      Full Member
                      • Nov 2010
                      • 16123

                      #40
                      No one seems yet to have thought to speculate upon whether whoever devised this waste of time might him/herself have been somewhat backward; nor has anyone mentioned the notorious barb against Max Reger that his name, like his music, spells the same whether forwards or backwards...

                      Comment

                      • Mal
                        Full Member
                        • Dec 2016
                        • 892

                        #41
                        Originally posted by oddoneout View Post
                        Look down your knowledgeable noses by all means but please remember we can't all be high brow musical encyclopedias, nor does everyone listening to R3 want the same thing of it. I don't like the Thursday afternoon 'gap' that is the opera matinee slot, and am likely not alone in that, but that's not a reason to say it shouldn't be there. Given the 24 hour R3 output and choice of ways to listen to it, is the EC irritation such a big deal?
                        I'm not a high brow musical encyclopedia, I turn on R3 for quite short periods of time, maybe tuning in to essential classics for thirty minutes hoping to discover a new piece of classical music that I might enjoy. Yesterday I turned it on and got that irritating backwards quiz, today some woman talking about her garden and how she dislikes scratchy string quartets (!) Hey I come to discover string quartets, not be told they are rubbish! (It actually got quite good after this appalling interview - they do know how to do it. Isn't it obvious that they should simply go on playing the music, with good short links, and ditch the naff guests?)

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X