Originally posted by mercia
View Post
End in sight for Classical Collection?
Collapse
X
-
Norfolk Born
-
Originally posted by mercia View Postnice one on breakfast this morning. Text in to give a name to Beethoven op 70 no 2, the trio that isn't The Ghost
wasn't this the one they got into a bit of a muddle over the other day?
Radio 3 sending itself up?
It's good to see that the presenters have a sense of humour even if that's not always the case with their listeners.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Word View Post
It's good to see that the presenters have a sense of humour even if that's not always the case with their listeners.It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by french frank View PostHeh, heh! One intriguing thing: it would have lost its point totally if they hadn't been well aware that the original announcement Had Been Noticed!
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Word View PostOh yes, undoubtedly. I think poking a little friendly fun at some of the posts on here was part of the humour .
Laughing at oneself is so much more endearing than laughing at other people's expenseIt isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Comment
-
-
Norfolk Born
Originally posted by Panjandrum View PostNo doubt some listeners would ROTFL if the jocks started hurling custard pies at each other and the guests.
Or is this a cleverly disguised further 'dig' at 'a certain presenter'?
Comment
-
Norfolk Born
-
Oh, so sorry . You asked "Or is this a cleverly disguised further 'dig' at 'a certain presenter'?" but I couldn't see that there was any connection.
I thought it was just the point that some people will laugh at anything (even, possibly, at people being critical), even if it's not funny and not even intended to be. One could dissect it further but that would destroy the slenderly graceful element of humour that was referred to in mercia's original remarkIt isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Ofcachap View PostAre you using ROTFL in its regular sense of 'Regular Old Text Formatting Language', or the more esoteric 'Rasch Obige Teilerkenntnis Frenetisch Lobend'?
Or is this a cleverly disguised further 'dig' at 'a certain presenter'?
(Sorry . Presumably Panjandrum's use of outdated Internet/text 'speak' was to contrast with Ms Walker's more contemporary phraseology but even the uncool kids no longer LOL .)Last edited by Word; 20-05-11, 19:37.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by amateur51 View PostFor me, saly, it all comes back to the comparison with cricket.
]
Without new spectators/listeners in this commercial world we have what we love will be gone and if short sharp snippets of slogging/popular pieces save something is it not a price that has, sadly, to be paid?
Comment
-
-
It's an enticing argument, antongould. But where is the evidence that R3's audience was similarly declining? (apart from some hefty falls in the immediate wake of some of the recent changes). And if one is referring to the audience for classical music, rather than the audience for R3, wouldn't more promotion and coverage on mainstream channels be more effective in building a new audience than lowering the standards of R3? Shouldn't the BBC's classical music station cultivate a knowledgeable audience while Classic FM provides the lighter entertainment?
A second point is that whereas new listeners to R3 for the classical music are very welcome, are the methods increasingly being used (personalities/celebrities, 'favourites', undemanding pieces) the only possible methods and are they the best methods for building a knowledgeable audience?It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Comment
-
-
Norfolk Born
Originally posted by antongould View PostPerhaps it does all come back to a comparison with Cricket but in a different way - in the 50s and early 60s the proper game of cricket many of us love was dying, no one was watching the 3 day county game and test match crowds were falling. The introduction of one day or now even shorter games effectively saved cricket - you could say very little real cricket remains but it is still here! What one day cricket did was to bring in new spectators lots of them and some now follow the 3/4 day game.
Without new spectators/listeners in this commercial world we have what we love will be gone and if short sharp snippets of slogging/popular pieces save something is it not a price that has, sadly, to be paid?
0600-0900 'Twenty-Twenty Breakfast' (including 6 sessions of 'Beat The Intro' - answers by text ONLY)
0900-1200 'Fifty-Over All Day Brunch - First Innings' (extracts from 50 of your favourite classics)
1200-1300 Classical Chart Update - your chance to vote that pesky Rautavaara opera off the No. 1 spot)
1300-1500 'Fifty-Over All Day Brunch - Second Innings' (with a 'no repeat of the same movement' guarantee)
1500-0500 'Day-Night International' (chunks of opera, most sung in foreign languages. Listen out for the 'Power Play segments at 40 minutes past odd-numbered hours).
Comment
Comment