Originally posted by smittims
View Post
Late-evening pleasures on Radio 3
Collapse
X
-
Given more of Hildegard's compositions survive than any other 12th century composer I find it hard to believe the claim that she was merely following tradition to be anything more than rhetorical rodomontade. Whatever you may think of her music she is surely one of music's true originals. Her compositions are characterised by virtues conspicuously absent from most of her contemporaries: extended, arch like florid melody, a wide range of poetic imagery, a clear musical and poetic personality.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Sir Velo View PostGiven more of Hildegard's compositions survive than any other 12th century composer I find it hard to believe the claim that she was merely following tradition to be anything more than rhetorical rodomontade. Whatever you may think of her music she is surely one of music's true originals. Her compositions are characterised by virtues conspicuously absent from most of her contemporaries: extended, arch like florid melody, a wide range of poetic imagery, a clear musical and poetic personality.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by LMcD View PostSadly unavailable in the UK (unless anybody knows a way round this prohibition) is the 1994 BBC dramatized documentary in which Hildegard was played by Patricia Routledge (who can sing a bit and worships regularly ay Chichester Cathedral).
Or on YouTube (low-res video).
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Sir Velo View PostGiven more of Hildegard's compositions survive than any other 12th century composer I find it hard to believe the claim that she was merely following tradition ...
But when I hear enthusiasts for R 3u (or some other musical 'presentations' I won't mention ) discussing them, I hear nothing but 'I enjoy it', 'It really helps me relax', 'It's ideal late-night listening for me'. My opinion of what I hear in such programming is that it's 'ultraprocessed', it's flavour enhancers, it's marketing to encourage listening. It's not the music itself - or any bit of it - which with different presentation (full-length pieces, more varied than the gentle, relaxing) I would ordinarily enjoy. On jazz as music, I don't know what I'm talking about; on classical music generally, even I know enough to recognise soulless mass-production. So the point I'm making - if you're still with me - is that subjective value judgements are limited to the judge not to the judged. They have to be set against the judgement of knowledgeable enthusiasts.It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Comment
-
-
I remain suspicious about Hildegard, and wonder if she is much more than an anachronistic wish-fulfilment invention of modern feminism.
What I hear is little more than plainchant , with embellishments which sound to me as if they've been added by recent editors and performers . To my ears it's what they wish she'd written.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by smittims View PostI remain suspicious about Hildegard, and wonder if she is much more than an anachronistic wish-fulfilment invention of modern feminism.It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Comment
-
-
Ah, well, I think you only think I mention it rather often because you're looking for it!
I do mention it occasionally because it affects so many things these days that one cannot escape it, but in fact I don't mention it more than lots of other things. I wouldn't mention it at all if it weren't pushed in my face so often, and I feel that a lot of what is said is biased, untrue and misleading I ought to challenge it (or 'call it out' as they say) . Maybe if I ignore it it will go away.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by smittims View PostI remain suspicious about Hildegard, and wonder if she is much more than an anachronistic wish-fulfilment invention of modern feminism.
What I hear is little more than plainchant , with embellishments which sound to me as if they've been added by recent editors and performers . To my ears it's what they wish she'd written.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by smittims View PostAh, well, I think you only think I mention it rather often because you're looking for it!
I do mention it occasionally because it affects so many things these days that one cannot escape it, but in fact I don't mention it more than lots of other things. I wouldn't mention it at all if it weren't pushed in my face so often, and I feel that a lot of what is said is biased, untrue and misleading I ought to challenge it (or 'call it out' as they say) . Maybe if I ignore it it will go away.
Comment
-
-
I think it speaks to people today because it's been presented cleverly as the work of a feisty, empowered modern woman transplanted into the Middle Ages, in the same waythat Marain Marais' music , after being ignored for centuries, suddenly spoke to people today when it was featured in a popular film: it's the musical Girl with Pearl Earring.
I was listening this morning on TTN to Maciej Radziwill's Divertimento in D. Like the other composers mentioned above, he's an example of hundreds, perhaps thousands of intelligent people who learnt to write an acceptable and pleasant piece of music, but he's not so highly praised as Jaquet and Strozzi because there was no extra-musical reason for promoting him to 'great composer' status'.
By contrast, I also listened to what is perhaps Beethoven's least work ,the Music for a Ritterballett, WoO 1. Even here what is clear is the ability to write vital memorable music . That's the difference for me.
Last edited by smittims; 02-12-24, 07:35.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by smittims View PostAh, well, I think you only think I mention it rather often because you're looking for it!It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by smittims View PostI think it speaks to people today because it's been presented cleverly as the work of a feisty, empowered modern woman transplanted into the Middle Ages, in the same waythat Marain Marais' music , after being ignored for centuries, suddenly spoke to people today when it was featured in a popular film: it's the musical Girl with Pearl Earring.
I was listening this morning on TTN to Maciej Radziwill's Divertimento in D. Like the other composers mentioned above, he's an example of hundreds, perhaps thousands of intelligent people who learnt to write an acceptable and pleasant piece of music, but he's not so highly praised as Jaquet and Strozzi because there was no extra-musical reason for promoting him to 'great composer' status'.
By contrast, I also listened to what is perhaps Beethoven's least work ,the Music for a Ritterballett, WoO 1. Even here what is clear is the ability to write vital memorable music . That's the difference for me.
I forgot…she’s also a Saint. Something even Beethoven never managed.Last edited by Ein Heldenleben; 02-12-24, 09:34.
Comment
-
Comment