Late-evening pleasures on Radio 3

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • LMcD
    Full Member
    • Sep 2017
    • 8656

    #31
    [QUOTE=vinteuil;n1323699]... the fact that alternatives exist is a very poor argument against the challenge :

    I'm sure you're right, but I'm just glad they're there, and it would be silly not to use them.
    As it happens, I tuned in for the Radio 3 news summary and am now enjoying the first item on Classical Live, which is Franck's Piano Quintet. It's all a bit random, really, rather like life in general.

    Comment

    • Nick Armstrong
      Host
      • Nov 2010
      • 26574

      #32
      Originally posted by vinteuil View Post
      ... the fact that alternatives exist is a very poor response to the challenge :

      "Radio 3 no longer provides the serious (I want to say, 'sometimes demanding') cultural fodder that it was originally set up to do, and which (in various weakening states) it was doing until (relatively?) recently."

      .
      Well that depends upon whether one sees it as a challenge or a fait accompli
      "...the isle is full of noises,
      Sounds and sweet airs, that give delight and hurt not.
      Sometimes a thousand twangling instruments
      Will hum about mine ears, and sometime voices..."

      Comment

      • vinteuil
        Full Member
        • Nov 2010
        • 12938

        #33
        Originally posted by LMcD View Post
        As it happens, I tuned in for the Radio 3 news summary and am now enjoying the first item on Classical Live, which is Franck's Piano Quintet. It's all a bit random, really, rather like life in general.
        ... some might say that Radio 3 should not be "all a bit random, really"



        And some of us, more severely, might wish that Radio 3 should be better than "life in general"




        Last edited by vinteuil; 22-11-24, 14:14.

        Comment

        • vinteuil
          Full Member
          • Nov 2010
          • 12938

          #34
          Originally posted by Nick Armstrong View Post

          Well that depends upon whether one sees it as a challenge or a fait accompli
          ... if I were to accept your (?) defeatist position, I might argue - why is public money (I know, but such moneys are fungible) being used to provide pap that is being well provided (I'm told) on commercial channels...

          .

          Comment

          • AuntDaisy
            Host
            • Jun 2018
            • 1785

            #35
            Originally posted by vinteuil View Post
            ... if I were to accept your (?) defeatist position, I might argue - why is public money (I know, but such moneys are fungible) being used to provide pap that is being well provided (I'm told) on commercial channels...


            Possibly random. Jim Hacker's outrage at Mozart, Wagner, Verdi, Puccini...
            Jim is ruffling a few feathers by suggesting that football should get funding just like theatre and the arts.Subscribe: http://bit.ly/BBCComedyGreatsWATCH MO...

            Comment

            • vinteuil
              Full Member
              • Nov 2010
              • 12938

              #36
              Originally posted by AuntDaisy View Post


              Possibly random. Jim Hacker's outrage at Mozart, Wagner, Verdi, Puccini...
              https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zl0aEz34A4o
              ... lovely, lovely.

              Painful too. So much of my working life was in that particular battlefield....

              Comment

              • Nick Armstrong
                Host
                • Nov 2010
                • 26574

                #37
                Originally posted by vinteuil View Post

                ... if I were to accept your (?) defeatist position, I might argue - why is public money (I know, but such moneys are fungible) being used to provide pap that is being well provided (I'm told) on commercial channels...

                .
                An excellent question.

                "...the isle is full of noises,
                Sounds and sweet airs, that give delight and hurt not.
                Sometimes a thousand twangling instruments
                Will hum about mine ears, and sometime voices..."

                Comment

                • oddoneout
                  Full Member
                  • Nov 2015
                  • 9289

                  #38
                  [QUOTE=LMcD;n1323700]
                  Originally posted by vinteuil View Post
                  ... the fact that alternatives exist is a very poor argument against the challenge :

                  I'm sure you're right, but I'm just glad they're there, and it would be silly not to use them.
                  As it happens, I tuned in for the Radio 3 news summary and am now enjoying the first item on Classical Live, which is Franck's Piano Quintet. It's all a bit random, really, rather like life in general.
                  It is a good thing that alternatives exist, especially if a person can use them. It is not a good thing if the publicly funded radio station that should be providing a halfway decent offering to be included in the choices available, is not doing so, thus forcing the use of alternatives.

                  Comment

                  • french frank
                    Administrator/Moderator
                    • Feb 2007
                    • 30471

                    #39
                    What nobody seems to address, and I'd challenge the R3 apologists to do so , is that R3's classical music provision offered so much more than the music, available widely on CDs, streaming services, even now and again in snatches on R3; but where is the analysis, the critical perspective, the educational content for intelligent, diversely informed, listeners who had advanced beyond primary school? If it's not on R3 in the first place it won't be on Sounds.
                    It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.

                    Comment

                    • LMcD
                      Full Member
                      • Sep 2017
                      • 8656

                      #40
                      Originally posted by Nick Armstrong View Post

                      Well that depends upon whether one sees it as a challenge or a fait accompli
                      It's definitely the latter, I'm afraid, but I would say that I'm being realistic rather then defeatist. I don't approve of many of the recent changes, but I can't see them being reversed.
                      Last edited by LMcD; 22-11-24, 17:11.

                      Comment

                      • Serial_Apologist
                        Full Member
                        • Dec 2010
                        • 37835

                        #41
                        Originally posted by LMcD View Post

                        It's definitely the latter, I'm afraid, but I would say that I'm being realistic rather then defeatist. I don't approve of many of the recent changes, but I can't see them being reversed.
                        It's much the same right across the mass media: the top-down- do-as-I-say editorial compliance with rich owner command structures that force obedience on the lower orders on pain of dismissal and/or redundancy. Toe the line or else. Without the TUC - (who preside over the NUJ and other such unions supposed to uphold freedom of the press inclusive of those working within it) - updating their constitutional sectorialism and extend bargaining remits beyond wages and conditions of work to content and right to equal reply, journalists and reporters will sooner or later sacrifice integrity to truth to expediency and just carry on knuckling under.

                        Comment

                        • eighthobstruction
                          Full Member
                          • Nov 2010
                          • 6449

                          #42
                          ....I'm afraid I'm more interested by the Late-evening pleasures...."You had me at Late-evening pleasures" (especially with your little hyphen there "your little dash, it makes me want to join words together"....."I cannot wait for your Late-night pleasures, meet me at midnight"....
                          bong ching

                          Comment

                          • Serial_Apologist
                            Full Member
                            • Dec 2010
                            • 37835

                            #43
                            Originally posted by eighthobstruction View Post
                            ....I'm afraid I'm more interested by the Late-evening pleasures...."You had me at Late-evening pleasures" (especially with your little hyphen there "your little dash, it makes me want to join words together"....."I cannot wait for your Late-night pleasures, meet me at midnight"....
                            Tune in in 20 minutes' time, eighth.

                            Comment

                            • smittims
                              Full Member
                              • Aug 2022
                              • 4349

                              #44
                              Quite right, ff. The old Radio 3 , like the Third,was never just music, but drama,poetry, discussons, talks on recent developments in science ((Fred Hoyle and his 'big bang') and so on. It's when we notice the disappearance of all those programmes we see how much R3 has changed.

                              Comment

                              • vinteuil
                                Full Member
                                • Nov 2010
                                • 12938

                                #45
                                Originally posted by smittims View Post
                                Quite right, ff. The old Radio 3 , like the Third,was never just music, but drama,poetry, discussons, talks on recent developments in science ((Fred Hoyle and his 'big bang') and so on. It's when we notice the disappearance of all those programmes we see how much R3 has changed.
                                ...not Hoyle's 'big bang' - he was a fervent opponent of the theory, and always promoted 'steady state'. He never accepted the big bang, even tho' all the evidence was in its favour way before his death in 2001

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X