Originally posted by AuntDaisy
View Post
Sean says he was sacked
Collapse
X
-
-
-
Originally posted by JoMarch View PostThanks for the welcome! .. silly isn't it, that you post when angry when there's so much to be glad about ?!.. We still have Sarah on Sunday mornings and a bit of Ian here and there. That is a positive...
..mustn't grumble but oh, Sean, that's bloody tragic
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Ein Heldenleben View Post
I wonder what the alternatives were ? His skill is very much live studio . He is one of the few R3 presenters who I’ve heard do relatively challenging interviews with politicians- perhaps surprising as he doesn’t have a journalist background (until now) . There are established journalists on R3 who don’t do them as well as he does.
As with case of Lammy's "wrong class running Britain", those in the lower echelons of the BBC should gang together in support of the likes of Rafferty (and unwarranted changes to the character of Radios 3, 2, 1 or whatever). OK, the BBC would have the power to then sack the lot of them - plenty of willing obedients waiting in the wings for prestigious jobs; so what to do. Picket Broadcasting House, picket Manchester HQ, bring the entire show to a halt until the big jobs concede. And if the courts injunct or the boys and girls in blue break up your action, there lie the lessons to be learned about class society. There was a TV discussion on this very issue this morning - what was missing was the angle of CLASS - since humankind overran earth's carrying capacity and learned to store or save up for a rainy day, somebody had to guard the surplus and by using the power conferred privileged themselves off the rest who actually created wealth by transmogrifying base materials into product by building kingdoms and private armies around themselves. Lammy probably restricts his idea of class to nice people by virtue of experience at the bottom versus rich bastards who live in their own world. An ounce of Marxism would clarify all this, pointing out the the ruling class are COMPELLED to treat the lowest in this way (while placating the middle layers with blandishments and favours) or otherwise go under - the truth being that they are educated to for toughness, many CEOs now being classified as psychopaths, and constantly at DAGGERS DRAWN with each other to remain competitive and profitable, this being the sole criterion of what holds them together as a class.
Reform the system? P*ssing in the wind or trying to make water run uphill. Choose your own metaphor
Comment
-
-
The Sean Rafferty situation is just another example of the shabby regime that runs the BBC. Another specific example was Ken Bruce on Radio 2 but also on the way News staff were demoted or removed from the roster on television, and the treatment of Local Radio staff, particularly those who had been giving good loyal service for many years. Of course the former Culture Secretary who starved the BBC of funds in freezing the Licence Fee really gave momentum to the BBC to make cuts whic to me seemed to benefit the managers morethan the listeners and viewers, particularly older listeners.
Comment
-
-
Let’s face it Sean WAS and IS In Tune.
I am interested that the BBC says it offered him a new weekly programme,(so not a move to part-time In Tune presenting then) but it was turned down - what form did it take I wonder?
It all seems very clumsy, given that SR's contract was due to finish early next year anyway. It does make me wonder if perhaps this is a distraction from something else that is planned.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by oddoneout View PostWhich may have been at least part of the issue? If that version of In Tune is no longer what the likes of Sammyboy wants, then that would apply to the long-standing presenter as well, especially if the other presenter is KD - so very much the epitome of "refreshed R3".
I am interested that the BBC says it offered him a new weekly programme,(so not a move to part-time In Tune presenting then) but it was turned down - what form did it take I wonder?
It all seems very clumsy, given that SR's contract was due to finish early next year anyway. It does make me wonder if perhaps this is a distraction from something else that is planned.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Ein Heldenleben View Post
I wonder what the alternatives were ? His skill is very much live studio . He is one of the few R3 presenters who I’ve heard do relatively challenging interviews with politicians- perhaps surprising as he doesn’t have a journalist background (until now) . There are established journalists on R3 who don’t do them as well as he does.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Old Grumpy View Post
What in this context is a "journalist"? According to his Wiki "Early Career" section he was involved in News and Current Affairs broadcasting in NI before moving into arts broadcasting.
Which explains why he is the best live interviewer on R3 by a country mile and should stay on In Tune.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by oddoneout View PostI am interested that the BBC says it offered him a new weekly programme,(so not a move to part-time In Tune presenting then) but it was turned down - what form did it take I wonder?
Originally posted by oddoneout View PostIt all seems very clumsy, given that SR's contract was due to finish early next year anyway. It does make me wonder if perhaps this is a distraction from something else that is planned.
It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Ein Heldenleben View Post
Yeah well the thing is : I was TOTALLY wrong and he is in fact a very experienced journalist and presented live news and current in Northern Ireland which is no walk in the park.
Which explains why he is the best live interviewer on R3 by a country mile and should stay on In Tune.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by cloughie View PostThe Sean Rafferty situation is just another example of the shabby regime that runs the BBC. Another specific example was Ken Bruce on Radio 2 but also on the way News staff were demoted or removed from the roster on television, and the treatment of Local Radio staff, particularly those who had been giving good loyal service for many years. Of course the former Culture Secretary who starved the BBC of funds in freezing the Licence Fee really gave momentum to the BBC to make cuts whic to me seemed to benefit the managers morethan the listeners and viewers, particularly older listeners.
I'm not sure whether Sean could have been offered the chance to become the host of Private Passions, as it is not a BBC Studios production.Last edited by LMcD; 28-06-24, 22:58.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by LMcD View PostI'm not sure whether Sean could have been offered the chance to become the host of Private Passions, as it is not a BBC Studios production.
There are two ways of thinking about this: as an exercise in worker-management relations BBC practice is and always has been terrible. It trades on its reputation and the fact that many people want to work for the BBC and that gives management the upper hand which they misuse (that's my analysis, by the way, not a factual account of the situation). The other point, though, is that an employee on (a) fixed term contract(s) with their employer, once they reach normal retirement age, can't expect to be offered successive contracts for as long as the employee wants to go on working.It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Comment
-
Comment