Originally posted by Roger Webb
View Post
The Eternal Breakfast Debate in a New Place
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by LMcD View Post
Nothing to do with Manon des Sources, then. (Probably my all-time favourite film together with Jean de Florette).
Comment
-
-
My first listen today since PT's departure. Was warming to T McK's style when he announced, I believe, 'a Haydn string quartet later'. Oh good, I thought, a change of policy....but no, just the first movement.
I wish presenters would not say 'a symphony' or 'a quartet' when talking up a later work but acknowledge that we're going to hear one movement.
Comment
-
-
Others will disagreebut I feel presentation was much better when professional broadcasters (rather than musicians or other 'celebs') were backed up by knowledgeable production staff. No musician is equipped to talk knowledgeably about all the genres and sub-genres of the music covered by R3, nor are professional broadcasters. But I'm probably less susceptible to the personal charms of individual presenters ...
It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Roger Webb View Post
Yes, mine too (amongst many other French films!)....have you seen Le Château de Ma Mère and La Gloire de Mon Père? Two other Marcel Pagnol stories made into charming films, this time by Yves Robert rather than Claude Berri.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by french frank View PostOthers will disagreebut I feel presentation was much better when professional broadcasters (rather than musicians or other 'celebs') were backed up by knowledgeable production staff. No musician is equipped to talk knowledgeably about all the genres and sub-genres of the music covered by R3, nor are professional broadcasters. But I'm probably less susceptible to the personal charms of individual presenters ...
Comment
-
-
[QUOTE=french frank;n1335772]Others will disagreebut I feel presentation was much better when professional broadcasters (rather than musicians or other 'celebs') were backed up by knowledgeable production staff. No musician is equipped to talk knowledgeably about all the genres and sub-genres of the music covered by R3, nor are professional broadcasters. But I'm probably less susceptible to the personal charms of individual presenters ...
[/
In the old days the professional announcers (some of whom were graduate or conservatoire trained musos) generally read much shorter links between much longer pieces. Now there’s a mix of presenters some of whom like Tom McKinney, Andrew MacGregor , and Hannah French are definitely expert level. I have to say I prefer the modern presenters of today to the more formal days of yesteryear when it was evident that many announcers were reading from a producer’s script. It was often the case that phrases cropped up again - as if producers were copying from prepared blurbs on certain classic works. I don’t blame them if that was the case - some had massive workloads.
The really skilful element of the producers’ job was in supervising live broadcast and perhaps even more so recordings.Those were turned round really quickly with minimal time for the conductor or soloist to listen to playback. Listening for errors and spotting edit points - that struck me as quite high pressure.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by antongould View Postwhat is your definition of a professional broadcaster …… ???? A Skellers, a Georgia, an Alker …… ????
All of which explains why I don't listen any more: I'm quite resistant to routine and addiction
.
It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by french frank View PostA broadcaster who had had some sort of voice/delivery training (nothing to do with accent, RP or other). All I require(d) them to do is/was to tell me about the music that was to be played and then play it in full. In any one hour I wouldn't want to hear more than something like five or six pieces at most, so there would be very little for the presenter/announcer to do. I would think about them by their first name and family name only: Sarah Walker, Hannah French, Donald Macleod, not Sarah, Hannah, Donald, Skellers &c.
All of which explains why I don't listen any more: I'm quite resistant to routine and addiction
.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by AuntDaisy View Post'Fraid some non-Breakfast presenters are addictive - John Shea, Susan Sharpe, Catriona Young, Jonathan Swain, Penny Gore...
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by vinteuil View Post... that's quite a civilized crew you have assembled there, AuntDaisy
Yes, and Paul Guinery. Times, generations and tastes change but what we seem to lack is anchors (not in the broadcasting sense, but in the sense of the things inherently worth keeping rather than casting off). Rather like the moral compass so often absent in public - and private - life, though a bit less so here than there.It isn't given us to know those rare moments when people are wide open and the lightest touch can wither or heal. A moment too late and we can never reach them any more in this world.
Comment
-
Comment